Want this question answered?
To obtain chemicals from their surroundings, break down food, grow, move substances, within their bodies and reproduce.
There are not two contradictory " models " that explain the origin of life. There are scientific hypotheses that are being tested and, some, yielding results that are suggestive and then there is religious myths of many types without any evidence in support of them
Sugar water is an example of a solution. This is because the sugar dissolves into the water without being changed chemically.
Life, as we know it - in all its forms, is proteins dissolved in water. You also get a lipid cell membrane, and some DNA which is currently necessary. [Note that life could have, and probably did, start without the DNA; but it gives such an advantage that you seldom see "life" without it (but please note prions).
This is a false statement: Each organ system is isolated from all other body systems.
yes
there would be no life. earth would just be... earth! without ANYTHING! that includes water, soil, sand... etc.
water is help to give our life
There would be no life because without the geometry of the water molecule, there would be no water. No water, no life.
To explain features & benefits of a proposed policy to the consumer
Water is the life itself. No life without water. One can't survive without water. All animals and plants that one live upon and rely upon can't survive without water. Even water is important to have marine transport.
Because it sustains life. Without water, there can be no life.
Water is a necessity in life. Without water, one cannot live. Thus, there are no Australians without water.
without water life will not exist
No.
Without water, earth would not support life.
Tax Free!