the big bang theory is accepted by science because there is an incredible amount of evidence leading scientists to believe it is true. For example, it was theorized that if the big bang were true, we should see microwave radiation in a very particular way in space. And when we looked the microwave radiation was there just as predicted.
Is a scientific theory but many people believe is true
The most widely accepted explanation for the start of the universe is the Big Bang theory. This theory suggests that the universe began as a singularity that rapidly expanded about 13.8 billion years ago, creating everything we see today.
Alfred Weneger, who was a German scientist somewhere in the 1930s. Other scientists didn't believe his theories at first, but about twenty years later, his theories appeared to be true.
The 1964 discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation supported the Big Bang theory of the universe. This radiation is considered a remnant of the early stages of the universe when it was hot and dense, aligning with the predictions of the Big Bang model.
True
Yes, some scientists believe in God. They might not believe everything that the Bible says is true, and just because they have the Big Bang Theory, some would argue "What created the Big Bang?"
the big bang is a theory. scientists believe that there was an explosion and now it keeps expanding. the world is 14.7 billion years old. the big bang isn't true because God created the world.
From another source as God is narrowly defined. Depends on your point of veiw. ______________________________ Scientists do not, in general, "believe" that theories are "true". Belief is for faith, for religions. Scientists accept that a particular theory adequately explains the facts and evidence that we have acquired so far, and look for other tests that will either confirm or refute the theory. We don't "believe" in the big bang theory; we accept that it is, so far, an incomplete explanation of how the universe came to be. When other facts are discovered that contradict it, then the "big bang theory" will be modified or replaced by another hypothesis that does a better job of explaining all of the existing and new facts. People who remain committed to accepting their pretty theories in the face of facts to the contrary are not really scientists, no matter what they claim. 'Creationism' by definition is that things were created by a supernatural entity. 'Big Bang' theorists don't usually claim there was anything supernatural involved, let alone an intelligent force driving it, and also the things being created are not complex organisms, but the most basic building blocks of matter. That means that's it's not hypocritical to believe in one but not the other. However people can also believe in both, that the Big Bang was the way their creator chose to create the universe.
Well I do now one theory about the universe. It's the big bang theory. The big bang theory is a theory about how the universe was created.Scientist think that a big explosion created the universe.Scientist found lots of evidence that the big bang theory was true.
Yes, scientists still believe in the cell theory today because it is a well-established and widely accepted principle in biology. The cell theory states that all living organisms are composed of cells, and all cells come from pre-existing cells through cell division.
True scientists are not fool to believe in ghosts.
Plate tectonics is considered to be a unifying theory because a consensus finds it to be true. Most scientists believe the plate tectonics cause volcanoes and earthquakes.
Conspiracy means in science when there's something that's an idea that might not be true , E.G:The Big Bang Theory , Scientist's theory is that the world was created by it & other religons might not believe this .
No the opposite is true actually. The law of cause and effect is one of the fundamental principles of physics. According to the Big Bang theory, all the matter and energy in the universe were concentrated in one area. This leaves the ulitmate question 'where did this energy and matter come from?' The Big Bang theory is a physical answer to an eternal question. That is why it falls short of being the ultimate theory that it claims to be. Who created the Big Bang? Things DONT just happen for the sake of it.
The big bang theory is just a theory, in the same way that gravity is "just a theory," that was made by evolutionsist that attempts to explian the earth comming into existence by a big bang. Some Christians believe that it is false and that God created the world. Others, like Jesuit priest George LeMaitre, believe it to be true -- mainly because he INVENTED the hypothesis! Since it was developed, the Big Bang Hypothesis has passed every experimental test, including the prediction of the Cosmic Background Microwave Radiation. Every other hypothesis has to say, "I have no idea WHY the CBMR is there, it just is." That's why the Big Bang has been elevated to a theory, like gravity, and all other ideas are hypotheses unsupported by any evidence.
If the big bang theory is correct then the Big Bang is important because that is the moment the universe is created. The fundamental importance of the theory is that it is a theory. This means that it is possible to search for information that either supports or refutes it. It is even possible to getsome of this information. If it turns out that this theory is not true, then the exciting and creative search for new theories will kick in.
law