because a scientific theory is 100% true and scientist are sure that the earth is rotating around the sun and the earth is shaped like a ball if if there is light on a part the pther will not have light
Yes, a scientific theory should make sense based on available evidence and be able to explain observations and predict future outcomes. A theory that does not make sense or contradicts established scientific principles would likely be considered invalid.
A preliminary untested explanation that seeks to explain observed phenomena is a hypothesis. It plays a crucial role in the scientific method as a starting point for further investigation and experimentation to determine its validity.
A scientific law describes a consistent and universal relationship observed in nature, like the law of gravity. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world based on evidence and reasoning, like the theory of evolution. Laws describe what happens, while theories explain why and how it happens.
Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift was not accepted in his lifetime because he lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, his evidence was not widely considered sufficient or conclusive at the time, and he faced significant opposition from the scientific community, particularly geologists entrenched in the established theory of stationary continents.
The two main theories explaining the shape of the Earth are the geoid theory and the oblate spheroid theory. The geoid theory suggests that the Earth is an irregular shape due to variances in gravitational forces and surface features. The oblate spheroid theory posits that the Earth is mostly a slightly flattened sphere, bulging at the equator and flattened at the poles due to its rotation.
Evolution is considered a scientific theory because it is based on a vast amount of evidence from multiple scientific disciplines, including genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy. The theory of evolution provides a comprehensive framework to explain the diversity of life on Earth and has made successful predictions that have been confirmed through experimentation and observation.
Yes, a scientific theory should make sense based on available evidence and be able to explain observations and predict future outcomes. A theory that does not make sense or contradicts established scientific principles would likely be considered invalid.
No. Phlogiston was a theory considered to be fact and actually hindered scientific knowledge until it was discredited. The theory was used to explain certain observations about flame, oxidation, and the formation of certain compounds, most noticeably cinnabar. As with some theories, phlogiston used variable factors to explain anomalies. For instance it was assumed to have negative weight under certain circumstances. Once oxidation was properly understood phlogiston theory was no longer considered true.
A scientific theory is a hypothesis that has been supported by much research, and is able to explain a wide variety of observations. During the process of formulating a theory, a hypothesis is refined as experiments yield new information. The purpose of a theory is to explain a scientific law.
A scientific theory is a hypothesis that has been supported by much research, and is able to explain a wide variety of observations. During the process of formulating a theory, a hypothesis is refined as experiments yield new information. The purpose of a theory is to explain a scientific law.
Yes, scientific theories can be revised or replaced based on new evidence or observations that better explain natural phenomena. This process is an essential part of the scientific method to ensure that our understanding of the world is as accurate as possible.
A scientific theory becomes better accepted as it helps explain more and more observations.
A theory must provide an explanation for an observation and be reinforced by observational data and experimentation.
Hello i am minakshi answer is that the big bang theory is an example of old scientific theory as big bang theory explains that there was an explosion but the isotropy and the homogenity of the universe is not explained by big bang theory to explain his we connect inflatation theory with big bang theory to explain it so the big bang theory is also an example of old scientific theory.
The explanation supported by many experiments is called scientific theory.
True. Unlike a scientific theory, a scientific model describes an observed pattern in nature without attempting to explain it.
Scientific theory is a well supported by evidence set of principles that explain and predict natural phenomenon. A scientific law explains what some phenomenon does scientifically and under the same conditions.