Gladiator vs Samurai who will win?

Viking vs. Samurai = Samurai Victorious Apache vs. Gladiator = Apache Victorious Mafia vs. Yakuza = Mafia Victorious

Well do to the fact that Samurais were trained military officers and Gladiators were usually just slaves being forced to fight for enterainment, most likely a Samurai.

a ninja will win because it has more speed than a gladiator. The gladiator only has strength.

Bandits vs. Samurai Squadron was created in 1978.

Gladiator all day niqqa

"Gladiator" was named Best Picture of 2000.

the samurai end trianing when the war would start between the samurai vs the ninjas

The ninjas would win any day of the week. The samurai would have three ninja stars in his armor before he could draw his sword.

Gladiator fights were basically to entertain. Politicians set up gladiator fights to win the favor of the crowds.

1970 vs. Raiders - Win 1971 vs. Chiefs - Win 1972 vs. Jets - Win 1973 vs. Redskins - Loss 1974 vs. Broncos - Loss 1975 vs. Rams - Loss 1976 vs. Bills - Win 1977 vs. Bears - Loss 1978 vs. Broncos - Win 1979 vs. Bears - Win 1980 vs. Bears - Loss 1981 vs. Chiefs - Win 1982 vs. Giants - Loss 1983 vs. Steelers - Win 1984 vs. Packers - Win…

Titanic (1997) won more Oscars than Gladiator.

have a smile on there face

I think the samurai would win given the age difference the samurai would have stronger swords and more protection

One on one a samurai would most likely win. Samurai had more advanced and better crafted weaponry, and they were trained more for one on one combat.

Depends if the gladiator has a bomb defuser and how stupid the suicide bomber is.

it is completely circumstantial you can't say that a ninja would kill a samurai every time and vice versa ninja and samurai fought all the time but the ninja wouldn't always win or lose same goes for the samurai

It would make since that the samurai win because he'd have a sword. But if the black mamba were to dodge the sword and make a smooth counter-attack, the samurai would be dead instantly.

i would have to say samurai because ninjas have small sword and samurai have big ones this man is wrong ninjas are stelthy and whicked by the way its not the size its how you use it Im sorry but the samurai would win. Someone simulated which was the most formidable warrior of all time and it was the samurai! Samurai would so win! i would have to agree with the second person. i mean…

Season 1 Apache vs Gladiator, Viking vs Samurai, Spartan vs Ninja, Knight vs Pirate, Yakuza vs Mafia, Green Beret vs Spetznaz, Shaolin Monk vs. Maori Warrior, William Wallace vs Shaka Zulu, IRA vs Taliban Back For Blood Special Spartan vs Samurai, IRA vs Spetznaz Season 2 SWAT vs GSG-9, Atilla the Hun vs Alexander the Great, Jesse James Gang vs Al Capone Gang, Aztec Jaguar vs Zande Warrior, Nazi Waffen SS vs Viet Cong, Roman…

Deadliest Warrior - 2009 Gladiator vs- Apache 1-1 was released on: USA: 7 April 2009

Cloud Strife. He's got a buster sword that he wields with samurai-like precision, and enough agility to put any ninja to shame.

the samurai has a solid axle which allows for more droop vs the sidekick with IFS

Depends... wait... no it doesn't! Samurai had 4 different classes: 1st sentry, second sentry, third sentry, and elite samurai. A spartan would wipe a samurai off his windshield like a bug! But... elite samurai v.s. regular spartan... it would probaly end in a... DRAW SPARTANS HAD shortswords, sheilds, body armor, wallabe spear, and brute strength. SAMURAI HAD kia bow, katana, omsoul club(wooden club with beads), and Honor. WINNER: SPARTAN

The samurai would win. Unless the ninja could sneak attack the samurai before an actual battle could take place, the well trained samurai would easily overpower the much weaker and less trained ninja. The samurai were trained to be able to take multiple ninjas at once.

if the snake was poisonous it would win. if the snake wasn't poisonous then the tiger would win.