Almost certainly not, new species of bugs are being found almost every day. While the discovery of previously unknown mammals is fairly sporadic, it has happened in recent years and probably will do. It is unlikely there will ever come a point where we can categorically state we have discovered and named all living things on earth.
they help living beings by biology
Spontaneous generation. It was proved false, by numerous scientists, but ultimately Louis Pasteur, and eventually was replaced with the theory Biogenesis--that living things arise from living things
Fossils reveal what organisms lived before us.
No. Virologists, the scientists who study viruses, don't consider them living things because they do not meet all the criteria of the definition of life.
Basic chemical principles that affect living things include the structure and function of biomolecules such as proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and nucleic acids; the importance of water as a solvent for biochemical reactions; the role of enzymes in catalyzing biochemical reactions; and the necessity of maintaining proper pH levels for cellular processes. These principles are essential for understanding biological processes at the molecular level.
Robert Hooke discovered that living things are composed of cells.
Scientists/experts that classified them as non living things.
I believe it is because scientists have not discovered a way to make telescopes able to magnify to that extent.
biologist :)
they help living beings by biology
Plants are considered as living things because they breathe, grow and reproduce in different ways. They also need water that is why we have to water them.
They are taxonomists.
Aristotle
Scientists classify living things because then it's easier to share information, study, & discuss these living things.
The sun
Penis
Np