they are both Prokaryotes, Unicellular, and are either an Autotroph of a Heterotroph
Archaea
No, because algae and archaea belong to different domains.
Archaebacterias are known as ancient bacterias. Bacteria comes from Greek: Gk. bakterion "small staff," because first ones observed were rod-shaped.
Archaea and Eukaryote are two different domains from the three domains of life classification. And Prokaryotes belong to two domains: the bacteria and the archaea.
Yes, archaea have similar chemical make up to bacteria.
All life belongs to one of 3 domains: archaea, eukaryota, or bacteria. The archaea resemble true bacteria in shape but live in extreme conditions such as excessively hot, salty or acid. They differ genetically by possessing introns while true bacteria do not.
They are unicellular
Archaea
they are unicellular
like bacteria members of the domain archaea are unicellular prokaryotes
archaea are ancient prokaryotes and humans are eukaryotes. archaea and eukaryotes have some similar genetic processes so it is thought that archaea are evolutionary closer to eukaryotes. this in turn means that humans have evolved indirectly from archaea
Eukaryotes have a nucleus, Archaea do not.
Eukaryotes have a nucleus, Archaea do not.
Eukaryotes have a nucleus, Archaea do not.
No, because algae and archaea belong to different domains.
Archaea and Eubacteria
Archaea and Eubacteria