Both granite and rhyolite are felsic igneous rocks formed from very viscous silica rich magma. They have essentially the same composition. The difference between them is that granite cools slowly underground, forming large crystals while rhyolite cools rapidly above ground after a volcanic eruption forming small crystals or no crystals.
No. Granite cools relatively slowly; its large crystals are one method of observing this. Granite is referred to as a "phaneritic" igneous rock, meaning that it is coarse-grained. Coarse-grained rocks cool slowly, which means that the minerals have time to form large crystals before the rock solidifies. A rock with the same composition as granite that does cool quickly is called rhyolite.
One ton of granite is equivalent to approximately 36 cubic feet.
One subtype of granite is pink granite, which contains pink minerals such as orthoclase, feldspar, and biotite. These minerals give the granite its distinct pink hue.
Granite is neither, it is a mixture. You can see grains of different minerals in it.
A one ton cube of granite would be approximately 3.6 feet wide.
Granite is typically older than rhyolite. Granite is an intrusive igneous rock that forms underground from the slow cooling of magma, while rhyolite is an extrusive igneous rock that forms on the surface from the rapid cooling of lava. Therefore, granite generally predates rhyolite in terms of when it was formed.
Granite is already an igneous rock. If the granite simply melts and re-solidifies it will become granite again. If it melts and is erupted from a volcano, it will form rhyolite. If it melts and mixes with magma of a different composition, then it could form any number of igneous rocks.
If you take the words 'Red Bluff' and 'thunderbird' out of the question, the answer would be that granite and rhyolite may be composed of the same material, but one (granite) is a result of solidification underground, and the other (rhyolite) solidified above ground.
A similarity between a Sahel and the savannah is it gets rainfall :)
There is a similarity between the theories.The twins had just one similarity.
There isn't one.
One similarity is that both the Mauryan and the Gupta empires collapsed. One difference between the two are that the Mauryan's had a complex government, the Gupta's did not.
One similarity is that both the Mauryan and the Gupta empires collapsed. One difference between the two are that the Mauryan's had a complex government, the Gupta's did not.
One similarity is that both the Mauryan and the Gupta empires collapsed. One difference between the two are that the Mauryan's had a complex government, the Gupta's did not.
One similarity is that both the Mauryan and the Gupta empires collapsed
hunting
They have the same religions