How are laws of the land different to school and sports rules?
If you break a certain school, you might get punishment like detention, demerits, scolded are teacher/principal, etc. Breaking the sport rules, might just lead you to not join the part of the game, and you might be ending up with the same punishments which apply for breaking school rules. These types of punishments are not too severe. On the other hand, if you break a certain law of the land, you might get punishment like being fined with a lot of money, sentences to jail for number months or years. These punishments are very harsh and severe.
1 person found this useful
Answer Yes, when you argue a case in court you have to cite legal precedents. The Constitution and the laws passed by Congress along with the interpretations of those laws by the Court (all Courts, not just the Supreme Court) constitute the law. When courts disagree or a decision is appealed t…o a court the decision of the highest court becomes the new standard. The Supreme Court is the highest standard. Answer Yes and no. Usually the "Supreme Law of the Land" refers to the Constitution of the United States. According to Article VI, Section 2 of the Constitution, however, the "Supreme Law of the Land" means "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof." We usually take this to mean enacted laws , or laws made by a legislative body, like Congress, but it can also mean common law , or laws made as a result of judicial decisions. Supreme Court decisions make common law , which is enforceable and carries the rule of law, so it must also be in compliance with the Constitution. In that sense, rulings by the Supreme Court could be considered part of the "Supreme Law of the Land," as long as they are constitutionally sound. Article VI, Section 2 (Supremacy Clause) This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. For more information, see Related Questions, below. ( Full Answer )
Creation science From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Legal definition, creation science found not to be science Thevarious state laws prohibiting teaching of evolution werechallenged in 1968 at Epperson v. Arkansas which ruled that theywere unconstitutional, and the creationist movement turned top…romoting creation science as equal to evolutionary theory. In 1981Arkansas Act 590 mandated that "creation science" be given equaltime in public schools with evolution.Creation science wasdefined as follows: "Creation science means the scientificevidences for creation and inferences from those evidences.Creation science includes the scientific evidences and relatedinferences that indicate: :# Sudden creation of the universe,energy and life from nothing. . The insufficiency of mutation and natural selection in bringingabout development of all living kinds from a single organism. . Changes only with fixed limits of originally created kinds ofplants and animals. . Separate ancestry for man and apes. . Explanation of the earth's geology by catastrophism, includingthe occurrence of worldwide flood. . A relatively recent inception of the earth and livingkinds." This legislation was examined in McLean v. Arkansas, and the rulinghanded down on January 5, 1982, concluded that "creation-science"as defined above "is simply not science". The judgement defined theessential characteristics of science as being: :# It is guided bynatural law; . It has to be explanatory by reference to nature law; . It is testable against the empirical world; . Its conclusions are tentative, i.e. are not necessarily thefinal word; and . It is falsifiable. and found that "creation science" failed to meet these essentialcharacteristics for the following reasons. :# Sudden creation "fromnothing" is not science because it depends upon a supernaturalintervention which is not guided by natural law, is not explanatoryby reference to natural law, is not testable and is notfalsifiable. . "insufficiency of mutation and natural selection" is anincomplete negative generalization. . "changes only within fixed limits of originally created kinds"fails as there is no scientific definition of "kinds", theassertion appears to be an effort to establish outer limits ofchanges within species but there is no scientific explanation forthese limits which is guided by natural law and the limitations,whatever they are, cannot be explained by natural law. . "separate ancestry of man and apes" is a bald assertion whichexplains nothing and refers to no scientific fact or theory. . Catastrophism and any kind of Genesis Flood depend uponsupernatural intervention, and cannot be explained by naturallaw. . "Relatively recent inception" has no scientific meaning, is notthe product of natural law; not explainable by natural law; nor isit tentative. . No recognized scientific journal has published an articleespousing the creation science theory as described in the Act, andthough some witnesses suggested that the scientific community was"close-minded" and so had not accepted the arguments, no witnessproduced a scientific article for which publication has beenrefused, and suggestions of censorship were not credible. . A scientific theory must be tentative and always subject torevision or abandonment in light of facts that are inconsistentwith, or falsify, the theory. A theory that is by its own termsdogmatic, absolutist, and never subject to revision is not ascientific theory. . While anybody is free to approach a scientific inquiry in anyfashion they choose, they cannot properly describe the methodologyas scientific, if they start with the conclusion and refuse tochange it regardless of the evidence developed during the course ofthe investigation. The creationists' methods do not take data,weigh it against the opposing scientific data, and thereafter reachthe conclusions stated in [the Act] Instead, they take the literalwording of the Book of Genesis and attempt to find scientificsupport for it. The Act took a two-model approach to teaching identical to theapproach put forward by the Institute for Creation Research, whichassumes only two explanations for the origins of life and existenceof man, plants and animals: it was either the work of a creator orit was not. Creationists take this to mean that all scientificevidence which fails to support the theory of evolution isnecessarily scientific evidence in support of creationism. Thejudgement found this to be simply a contrived dualism which has noscientific factual basis or legitimate educational purpose. Thejudge concluded that "Act 590 is a religious crusade, coupled witha desire to conceal this fact", and that it violated the Firstamendment's Establishment Clause. The decision was not appealedto a higher court, but had a powerful influence on subsequentrulings. In 1982 Louisiana passed a "Balanced Treatment forCreation-Science and Evolution-Science in Public SchoolInstruction" Act, and the Supreme Court found that it also violatedthe First amendment in Edwards v. Aguillard, 1987. for moreinfo, see also link "Skeptic's: Intelligent Design" &"Wikipedia; Intelligent Design" Another View: Answer It was not "Creation Science" that was rejected by the USDistrict Court, but it was Intelligent Design that was the centerof the argument in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. First,creation science is an oxymoron. There is no scientific evidencewhatsoever that proves God created life. Christians (and those ofsome other religions) claim God created life. There is noscientific evidence that says God did not create life, either, andthat's important. The bottom line here is that it is intelligentdesign (ID) that was rejected. As regards ID, some individuals on the Dover School Board attemptedto get the ideas of ID taught in public school. Their manipulativetactics sharply divided their communities, and eventuallyprecipitated a civil suit. That suit ended up in US District Court(Middle District of Pennsylvania), and the petitioners said that IDwas not science. They also said that it was just religious creationin disguise, and as religious doctrine, there are Constitutionalrestrictions on its being presented in public schools. Thedefendants said that ID has scientific support, and was not rootedin religious teachings. And the trial began. As the plaintiffs had to make their case, they said that ID did notenjoy the support of credible science. They reeled out a story thatwould keep anyone who is interested in the subject of evolution (asa supporter or detractor) awake. They also produced documents thatwere written regarding the presentation of creationism, and(effectively) the "creationism" had been removed and "intelligentdesign" inserted. That was the smoking gun for many. The Honorable John E. Jones III (a George W. Bush appointee) ruledthat ID cannot be taught in public schools because it violates theEstablishment Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution. Hestates two things very clearly. The first is that intelligentdesign is not science. The second is that intelligent design"cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious,antecedents." When the gavel fell and the 139 page decision washanded down, we were left where we are today. Creation and/or creation science cannot be presented in publicschools because they are clearly religious doctrine. Intelligentdesign was shown to be "repackaged" creation science as well asshown to be unscientific, and presenting it in public schools wasdeclared a violation of the Constitution. Links are provided belowto check facts and learn more. Additional Comments: because creation science is untrue and the government doesn't wantto ruin your brain ( Full Answer )
Newton's 2nd law can be applied to many sports.. If you are playing soccer the more force you exert during the kick the faster the acceleration which means that when the ball leaves your foot it is going faster allowing it to go further. (The bigger the force the greater the acceleration and the…refore speed.) . If you are playing baseball , the pitcher trains to increase his arm strength because the ball is a bit heavier than other balls so more force needs to be exerted on it to move it at 80-100 miles per hour. (Force is proportional to mass x acceleration, to accelerate a heavier object requires more force.) . If you are playing tennis then you use a much heavier racket than if you are playing badminton . This is because tennis balls are much heavier than badminton shuttlecocks. As the racket hits the ball/shuttle two things happen, the ball/shuttle accelerates and the head of the racket decelerates. You want a racket that is the right weight for the thing you are hitting. Too heavy and you can't accelerate it fast enough making you slow, too light and it just stops when you hit the ball/shuttle. (Force is proportional to mass x acceleration, to accelerate a heavier object requires more force, to decelerate (an every day term for acceleration in the opposite direction to movement) requires more force.) . If you are a defender in football it is good to be heavy. When a fast light oponant hits you he will stop quicker if you are heavier than he is. (This is more easily explained using conservation of momentum but this is derived from Newton's 1st and 2nd laws.) ( Full Answer )
A rule is something that must be abided by some people. A law has to be abided by every person in that country (appart from the Monarch in many countries, such as the United Kingdom)
The difference between a law and a rule is that laws are enforced by the police and are therefore just legal rules. Although there are rules and regulations that are needed to follow in a society, they are distinguished by who are responsible for them and how they are formed. In many cases, the seve…rity of the sancations involved in laws are much greater than those of a rule. ( Full Answer )
law is set of rules enforced by the government and non legal rules are a set of rules not enforced by the government but enforced by a paticular institutation ( a football club, school, any sports club ) therfore if this laws are broken you can not be taken to court but would have consequences withi…n the institution ( Full Answer )
Laws are a legal term that you must abide by! Rules are just something that you have to stick to but cannot get prosecuted by not doing so.
rules- example: Rules of chess, simple rules of a classroom. (Rules are more of a game type thing) laws- laws of the speed limit, laws saying you cant copy money. (Laws are more of a federal thing)
A rule is something that is made up to comply with a certainsituation, like a rule that says every Thursday, students at aschool must wear red shoes. A regulation is a law that is usuallypunishable by a fine or other means. A bylaw is a rule to followwithin a specific group, like the chairman of a g…roup tellingothers when to speak. ( Full Answer )
I know some high school girls do not play advantage while professional females do. Professional males generally play best out of 5 sets while high school boys usually play best out of 3. Other than that, rules should generally be the same in professional tennis except for you can't hit the ball …boy or something like that. =] ( Full Answer )
How and why did the four Madhahib - the Hanafi, Shafi'i, Maliki and Hanbali - emerge and evolve? Why do Muslims follow one school in one country and another school in another country? Why this lack of uniformity? . As long as the Prophet -peace be upon him- was with the Ummah, he was the Imam. Mus…lims followed the Qur'an and the explanations of the Prophet -peace be upon him. Whenever they needed any explanation they went to the Prophet and he either waited for the divine revelation in order to answer them, or gave them his own answers according to the authority that Allah gave him. We, however, know that the Prophet -peace be upon him- also allowed sometimes the variety of opinions among his Sahabah in certain matters.. After the Prophet's departure from this earth, his Rightly Guided Caliphs (al-Khulafa' al-Rashidun) were the leaders of the Ummah. Unlike the Prophet, they were not the recipients of Divine revelation (wahy), but they had the full authority to interpret the Shari'ah in their time. Their knowledge, piety and religious authority made the people to go back to them for any final decision. The Caliphs used to consult many Sahabah, but then whatever decision they would make, theirs was the final word. In other words, we can say that there was only one Madh'hab during the time of al-Khulafa' al-Rashidun. They kept the unity and uniformity of the Ummah. We know that when Muslims differed on the readings of the Qur'an, the Caliph Uthman -may Allah be pleased with him- sent his authorized copy to all provinces and removed all other copies of the Qur'an from circulation and burned them. Thus he was able to keep the unity of the Ummah.. However, with the emergence of the Umayyad rule, the situation changed. The Umayyad caliphs did not have the same religious authority as the previous Khulafa'. Some of them deviated from the true path of Islam. Many Jurists and scholars used to avoid them and they began their teachings independently in their own locations. The great Sahabah and their followers (tabi'un) went to different areas and taught and preached to their local people. There was no central authority that could unite all the opinions at that time. The Islamic State was expanding. This set a trend for the development of various schools of interpretations under various able scholars and jurists.. The Hadith was also not fully collected. So there were two main trends among the early jurists: those who relied on Hadith only, while there were others who frequently used Qiyas and Ra'y. This situation continues throughout the Umayyad period.. After the Umayyad (661-750 CE) came the Abbasids. They were also not the ideal caliphs like al- Khulafa' al-Rashidun, but in comparison to the Umayyads, they were more supportive of Islamic law and its scholars. During their time various scholars were encouraged to write books on Islamic laws. They also patronized the collection of early Fatwas. The Caliphs encouraged religious discussions and debates. Various scholars had the opportunity to debate their positions with others. Due to more discussions and debates, some people changed their opinions. Some schools were eliminated and others merged into major schools. Thus four major schools of Fiqh came about. The crystallization of four major Madhahib of Islamic Fiqh came about by the 3rd century of Hijrah or the 9th century of the common era, before this there were about twenty different Madhahib.. Once the Madhahib became established in different areas, the local teacher used them to teach the Shari'ah to their students. The local courts applied the decisions and Fatwas of their local jurists. Thus in a natural way the Madhahib spread in different areas. Although we do not have uniformity among Muslims at this time, we should still try to unite them with tolerance and broadmindedness. We should unite them as much as possible.. I am pleased to see that the fanatical loyalty to a particular Madh'hab among Muslims is decreasing, alhamdulillah. Now Hanafi, Shafi'i, Maliki and Hanbali and even Ja'fari pray together and work together. We read each other's books and attend the Islamic conferences together. In America this is happening much more than in any other place. I hope this trend will continue and our unity as well as the unity of the whole Ummah will increase, by the grace and mercy of Allah. Ameen. ( Full Answer )
um the high school sports has a lower level of compition and less intensity than collage
Newton's 2nd law can be applied to different sports in countlessways. In impact sports like football and hockey, the force ofimpact of a player whose mass is larger, will be larger. Anotherexample is the projectile motion of a ball can be predicted usingthe weight of the object, which is a mass time…s an acceleration. ( Full Answer )
the meaning of law means something very positive and also something the government use for us to be safe, while rules means like for an example in the classroom you have a classroom rules why? so that we will be safe and not hurt each other and be generosity theses are some classroom rules you will …may like to take down in your notes of information. . keep your hands and feet to your selves . do not throw anything in the classroom or around the classroom . to always be generous . listen and obey the person who is talking . respect each other . to always think positive and never think negative . work and help other students who need help in their own work . communicate with each other . never say swear words to other people especially people who is older then you . listen to the teachers and their orders so that you will be quick and safe . behave well ( Full Answer )
Try looking at the 14th amendment and the 19th amendment in the constitution that kinda has to do with it. -Superknowitall12345
They can be. For example, Boise State University Football Team won the WAC championship, and their Wrestling Team won the PAC 10 championship last season.
rules are things you should obey and the law is something you must obey. the law is set by the government and it is illegal to break it. not so much for rules, which are still important, but are usually set by people for health, safety, etc. it is not illegal, as such, to break the rules, although i…t is still important to abide by them and the law. that is my description of the difference between the two. ( Full Answer )
Holmes belongs to the realist school of thought and he defined law as 'the prophecies of what the courts will do in fact and nothing more pretentious are what i mean by the law'
There are several different schools of thought in the study of lawand legal processes. These include natural law, positivist law andlegal realism.
Under the "fair use" rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege …is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights. If you write or publish, you need a basic understanding of what is and is not fair use.. http://www.nolo.com/article.cfm/objectID/C3E49F67-1AA3-4293-9312FE5C119B5806 ( Full Answer )
This question bears directly on the concepts of Community and Customs. These conditions tend to have a positive feedback component in their operation. They tend to self-stability . It takes a crisis to change the order . e.g. Germany had to be defeated in order to root out the horrible poli…cies into which it had drifted. Without Chernobyl, perhaps the USSR would have continued to believe that their ideas were perfect. I am fortunate to live in a country free to adopt whatever beliefs I may, and free to defend them. Others are not so fortunate. Even in say Newton's day, if you did not start your publication with lots of Praise for the Deity, your offerings would be attacked. I am grateful for the scientific revolution, where we are free to consider say String Theory, and free to abandon it if it proves deficient. ( Full Answer )
There are literally libraries full of books on this subject - and it is WAY too complex a subject to be discussed on this venue.
Common law originated in England and and was later adopted in the U.S.. Common law is based on precedent (legal principles developed in earlier case law) instead of statutory laws . It is the traditional law of an area or region.. The "rule of law" is a concept which is based on the premise that… all citizens shall/will/should comport themselves in a lawful and orderly manner lives for the greater good and the peace of the community. ( Full Answer )
A rule of law is a specific statement that must be upheld. Due process means that there is a set procedure for enforcing the laws. They must be fairly and consistently applied to all citizens.
Land with different territories and people under a single rule is amonarchy. In a monarchy there is a king or queen in power. Theremight or might not be many territories.
No most schools like mine have more guy sport then girl spots . hope this helps
Land with different territories and people under a single rule iscalled a kingdom. An example of a present day kingdom is the UnitedKingdom of Great Britain.
Grad school encompasses any study after completing a bachelor's degree. Law school is one type of Grad school.
That will depend on the school. Some will allow you to transfer between schools. Others might require you to simply reapply.
They have quarters instead of halfs and the shot clock is smaller or there is no shot clock at all. Three point line is closer in high school.
Every government need some rules to govern the country and to maintain peace in the society. On the other hand equality before law means that every citizen shall be treated equal when the people come before the law to seek remedy. Chadmani
Sports are a vital part of life. And in all of them sports rules need to be firmly followed especially if we talk concerning safety In the early19th century when Extreme Sports was a well liked game have a set of rules but, without any referee to execute or impose these rules. Such rules in those ti…mes, does not have clear cut stipulations thus it became the reason of nuisance. It caused so much violence which made an awful notion for it. Due to the sprouting figure of violence concerning Baseball game which resulted in wounds to the players as well as the audience governing organizations determined and formulated Rules of the game that were necessary and applies till now. Like Baseball for most of the games sports rules are extremely easy, they are not intricate at all. The first rule that you must learn by heart is to keep every person harmless also this is merely common sense to by no means point and throw anything at another player. Mishaps can happen at all times we must make use of fine apparatus and accessories, which are specially intended for practice like indoor and outdoor practice. One is required to examine the order of the kit regularly to be certain that they are still in their best shape. This is better than changing the kit. Officials and spectators should constantly provide complete thought to rules for the reason that in Extreme Sports if Sport Rules aren't followed correctly hostility, disorder and jostle can create a terrible impression of the game. Also, good emotional stability is significant to any athlete and there are a couple of games where there are clear benefits of clear rules and regulations. During the years Baseball game has created illustrious legends. As of the case soccer enjoys its status as the most loved sport in the entire planet. Entertainingly it continues to get enhanced in time with its confirmed proficient set of rules. With the latest variation of the world's most accepted Extreme Sports. It's really a fun way to endorse and train the sports rules to young players. Finally rules can put off damaging every player must practice them accurately in their training time. The Sport Rules of most of the games are actually very easy but playing the game by such rules can be a bit tricky! Fundamental rules in any game are as vital as the players and the equipment. These will make any game more stimulating and more motivating. ( Full Answer )
The key is good track record with grades and studies in college. The actually topic studied will be important, but not critical. This looks like a good track to be a sports agent.
a law is something that is made from the goverment a rule is made by a policy
Laws: Rules of behavior enforced by sanctions and imposed on members of society by a sovereign authority. Rule: guide to behavior, possibly enforced by sanctions, imposed within a group. Custom: A traditional of expected way of behaving.
First, everybody has their own rules under there on house. Everybody needs to follow the same laws that the government gives them or, the people will go to jail.
In order to ensure people don't nearly kill each other, or it just simply means the rules simply just stated in another way.
Rule of Law is a state of order in which events conform to the law.As we can see from Dicey's 3 main concept of Rule of Law, we canconclude that rule of law means everyone is equal to the law,including the executive, judiciary and legislation. The law is thesupreme authority and no one can go above …it. Rule by law is means that no one is immune to the law set by thegovernment. The government use the law in the most convenient wayfor them to govern a particular state, meaning, they set the rulesand they are the supreme authority. They use the law to meet theirown needs. The law is a tool of government. ( Full Answer )
NO. you would have to sit out a year. but can still attend the classes of course. This is if you are an athlete at a divsion 1 school transfering to another division 1 school.
Law school is graduate school, and is attended after completion of a 4 year bachelor's degree. Collegiate athletics are played while you are completing your 4-year degree. Law schools give considerable weight to high grades when considering applicants, but also consider extracurricular activities, s…uch as sports, in the admissions process. Law is not an undergraduate major. Some colleges offer "pre-law," but law schools consider students from any major, and generally prefer to accept students with a variety of backgrounds. ( Full Answer )
The Athletic school is full of athletes, but the sports school is teaching people to be athletes.
The similarity is be responsible and accountable for your actions. An example:One Hammurabi law stated if a building fell and injured or killed the occupant,the builder was directly accountable and could have a member of their own family sacrificed for the shoddy construction
That is in the constitution, which was ratified unanimously (except Rhode Island who didn't vote).
There are several things different in the two. Little league Dixie Youth has a set of rules. Dizzy Dean (different age groups) have different rules. The difference will be seen moving more toward Major League baseball but not entirely! Examples: 1. Balk-High school has them little league 10U d…oesn't. 11U ball does have balks unless the local ground rules don't. 2. In High school there is no run limit per inning but there are various kinds of run limits in little league. 3. The infield-fly rule is in effect in high school No infield fly rule in little league 10U but 11U usually do have it. 4. The equipment, field size, length of the game, allowed coaches, pitch calls, etc. are some obvious ones but there are many. Sadly, Most people will not take the time to read the rules and if they do they need to spend time thinking of the situational settings before the play is made. As an umpire it is difficult to keep the two seperate but it can be done with diligence. The coach, parent should do the same. ( Full Answer )
Most major sports have a committee or other structure that overseesrules and practices. For instance, the NFL is an organization thatoversees American football.
The rule of law is something all people have to follow. The rule of man is the word he stats to be true and as if it is the right thing to do.
a law must be followed and if disobeyed you can get in big trouble and a rule isnt that big of a deal
If the school at witch the game is held is canceld then yes. The doors would probably be locked so you could get inside of the gymnasim
In criminal law there are many schools of thought and theories that conflict depending on which area you are referring to. There are basic sides of criminal law the prosecution and the defense and with those divides there are many different theories of how to handle evidence, testimony, interviewing… witnesses and charges to be filed. ( Full Answer )
The word is empire. It means anextensive group of states or countries under a single supremeauthority.