Black Dwarfs are still theoretical bodies in the Universe. Belief and scientific observations are two different things. In theory, they will exist, but until one is observed, there existence can not be confirmed. See related question
None of the above. White dwarfs and the black dwarfs they will become consist of a unique state of matter called electron degenerate matter.
I think white dwarfs. This is because they are much more low mass than black holes. White dwarfs are much more common in the universe than black holes, because we have only discovered a few black holes whereas we are aware of many white dwarfs.
According to astronomers and authors Jonathan Weiner and Carl Sagan, white dwarfs - which have been an accepted entities by all astronomers for decades - require an amount of time to "cool down" that well exceeds the current age of the universe - hence there hasn't been enough time for any of them to cool down yet and become "black dwarfs".
There are currently no black dwarfs. The time it would take for a white dwarf to cool to a black dwarf is greater than the current age of the universe.
Black Dwarfs are still theoretical bodies in the Universe. Belief and scientific observations are two different things. In theory, they will exist, but until one is observed, there existence can not be confirmed. See related question
None of the above. White dwarfs and the black dwarfs they will become consist of a unique state of matter called electron degenerate matter.
their colour is one thing but a black dwarf originates from a white dwarf
Stars are alike in that they are all massive celestial bodies composed primarily of hydrogen and helium, undergoing nuclear fusion in their cores to produce light and heat. However, they differ in several key characteristics, including size, temperature, luminosity, and lifespan. For instance, some stars are massive and bright, like blue giants, while others are smaller and cooler, like red dwarfs. Additionally, stars can vary in their life cycles, leading to different end states such as white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes.
Black dwarfs of black holes.
A sphere.
No black dwarfs are thought to exist. The estimated time it takes for a white dwarf to cool to a black dwarf is greater than the current age of the universe.
I think white dwarfs. This is because they are much more low mass than black holes. White dwarfs are much more common in the universe than black holes, because we have only discovered a few black holes whereas we are aware of many white dwarfs.
According to astronomers and authors Jonathan Weiner and Carl Sagan, white dwarfs - which have been an accepted entities by all astronomers for decades - require an amount of time to "cool down" that well exceeds the current age of the universe - hence there hasn't been enough time for any of them to cool down yet and become "black dwarfs".
There are currently no black dwarfs. The time it would take for a white dwarf to cool to a black dwarf is greater than the current age of the universe.
It is estimated that it would take trillions of years for a white dwarf to cool to a black dwarf, which is more than the current age of universe. So black dwarfs do not exist yet.
When a star dies, it can leave behind different types of stellar remnants depending on its mass. Some examples include white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes. White dwarfs are formed from the remnants of low to medium mass stars, neutron stars are formed from the remnants of massive stars, and black holes are formed from the remnants of the most massive stars.