Biochemistry is concerned with chemical substances and processes that occur within plants, animals and microorganisms. All life has prominent similarities at a molecular level. Organisms have basically the same:
swag bissh
The fossil record, although not complete, provides a lot of evidence. There is also supporting evidence from geological studies, and the extensive human and nonhuman genome studies that are currently being done.
Evolution is (very simply) populations having variations in genes over long periods of time. This being said, biochemistry is the study of biochemical reactions. One subset of biochemical reactions is the study of genetics. Evolution requires understanding of genetics, which in turn is a subset of biochemistry, hence they are connected.
This question can not be answered without more information.
The evidence for evolution is extensive and multi-layered, too much for me to cover comprehensively. The Wikipedia article 'Evidence of common descent' has many subcategories. these are: Evidence from genetics Evidence from palaeontology Evidence from comparative anatomy Evidence from geographical distribution Evidence from comparative physiology and biochemistry Evidence from antibiotic and pesticide resistance Evidence from complex iteration Evidence from observed speciation and adaptation Evidence from intraspecies modifications I would recommend the Wikipeidia article and I am sure there are a large number of YouTube videos dedicated to the subject.
The fact that sheep insulin can be substituted for human insulin is an example of evidence of evolution based on comparative biochemistry. Insulin is a peptide hormone.
biochemical evidence anatomical evidence fossils vestigial structure embryological evidence
swag bissh
The fossil record, although not complete, provides a lot of evidence. There is also supporting evidence from geological studies, and the extensive human and nonhuman genome studies that are currently being done.
Evolution is (very simply) populations having variations in genes over long periods of time. This being said, biochemistry is the study of biochemical reactions. One subset of biochemical reactions is the study of genetics. Evolution requires understanding of genetics, which in turn is a subset of biochemistry, hence they are connected.
This question can not be answered without more information.
The evidence for evolution is extensive and multi-layered, too much for me to cover comprehensively. The Wikipedia article 'Evidence of common descent' has many subcategories. these are: Evidence from genetics Evidence from palaeontology Evidence from comparative anatomy Evidence from geographical distribution Evidence from comparative physiology and biochemistry Evidence from antibiotic and pesticide resistance Evidence from complex iteration Evidence from observed speciation and adaptation Evidence from intraspecies modifications I would recommend the Wikipeidia article and I am sure there are a large number of YouTube videos dedicated to the subject.
The change in allele frequency over time in populations of organisms. An observed and observable fact, especially since gene sequencing has come into it's own. More to the point, evolution provides us with the evidence for evolutionary theory.
Paleontology, genetics, molecular Biology, taxonomy, evolutionary development and comparative anatomy, just to name a few.
Indirect Evidence of Evolution - is looking for signs of the results of evolution. - is evidence that can be used to deduce what you are trying to understand.
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
No. You need extant life for evolution to happen. Abiogenesis, a sub-discipline of biochemistry, concerns itself with this question.