Ore for nuclear plants has to be mined, refined, and enriched to produce nuclear fuel. Each of these steps has an environmental cost. Mining is often done in strip mines, denuding and altering the surface of the land. Mine tailings are often poisonous. Both mining and refining use copious amounts of petrochemicals. In the United States, enrichment is done by a highly polluting coal power plant. All of these add to global warming, though not as much as fossil fuels would to generate as much electricity.
Use of nuclear power at the nuclear plant is said by advocates to be safe and clean. Opponents of nuclear energy argue with this. Either way, there are releases of radioactive substances from all nuclear power plants from time to time, and more than a quarter of all plants in the United States are known to have contaminated the soil on which they stand with radioactive tritium. This is a short-lived isotope, but its presence can add 100 to 400 million dollars to the decommissioning costs, and this is reflected in the removal and processing of soil, which uses a lot of petrochemicals, again adding to global warming.
The decommissioning of plants takes care of low-level nuclear waste, and uses a large amount of petrochemicals. Typically it costs hundreds of millions of dollars, and the amount of waste is reflected in this figure, adding more to global warming.
We do not know how to deal with high-level nuclear waste. In some countries it is vitrified and shipped to other, poor countries willing to be paid to store it. In many cases it will not be safe for longer than human beings have existed.
The possibility of meltdown or other nuclear disaster has to be considered. The Chernobyl disaster happened in what is now the Ukraine. Neighboring Belarus was stll putting about 20% of its GNP into cleanup twenty years later. The radioactive substances from such a disaster are destructive to all life. The amount of plutonium now in the waste has been calculated to be a multiple of what would be sufficient to kill all animal life, worldwide.
Nuclear reactors produce a lot of waste heat which require a large source of water to act as a heat sink. Most plants are built near rivers or lakes to absorb the excess heat from the reactor to keep the plant from damaging itself. As a result, the water temperature increases which can kill off sensitive species and negatively impact the environment. Hotter water could allow bacteria or algae to grow unchecked, which negatively affects the water supply.
it the soil bad
no
Environmental Contamination Firstly, it is a known fact that nuclear energy is generated through nuclear fission of radioactive materials in a nuclear reactor. The radiations from these reactions are highly hazardous and coming into contact with them can have an impact on many generations to come. For instance, people who are exposed to these radiations may experience physical, mental and even genetic changes. These changes in their genes are even transmitted to their children in some cases, causing them to be born with a number of congenital defects and disorders. One can hardly ever forget the nuclear plant explosion in Chernobyl, Ukraine that destroyed the soil and water around that region and claimed numerous lives. see: http://engineering.suite101.com/article.cfm/concerns_regarding_nuclear_energy
The mission of the Energy Department is to ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions.
If it is stored in the nucleus, it must be nuclear energy.
Yes, nuclear energy is energy.
CO2 (carbon dioxide) is produced when things are burned - for example wood, petroleum (and petroleum products such as gasoline), and coal. Most energy sources that don't rely on burning won't produce carbon dioxide. This includes nuclear energy (although nuclear energy does have other environmental problems), wave energy, geothermal energy, solar energy, and wind energy.
it has an impact by farting from the clowds :)
Appearance of nuclear energy and nuclear weapons.
Specialist in Energy, Nuclear and Environmental Sciences
Positive environmental effects of nuclear energy revolve around air pollution. With nuclear energy, there is less waste that gets distributed into the atmosphere. The air is actually cleaner due to the fact that no air pollutants are released.
Nuclear energy is the world's largest source of emission-free energy. Nuclear power plants produce no controlled air pollutants, such as sulfur and particulates, or greenhouse gases. The use of nuclear energy in place of other energy sources helps to keep the air clean, preserve the Earth's climate, avoid ground-level ozone formation and prevent acid rain. Of all energy sources, nuclear energy has perhaps the lowest impact on the environment, including water, land, habitat, species, and air resources. Nuclear energy is the most eco-efficient of all energy sources because it produces the most electricity relative to its environmental impact.
Not much pollution unless there is a nuclear reaction.
No, the impact energy of a meteor is all from kinetic energy, nothing nuclear is involved.
Yes. Nuclear power is environmentally friendly.Even when you consider the ramifications of accidents, the overall environmental and safety impact, when you look at the big picture, is less than with fossil power.
The incident at a nuclear power plant in Chernobyl, Russia.
The 'use' of renewable energy [sources] must be maximized. And How!
It is a permanent source and its 'harvesting' has nearly no environmental impact.
The incident at a nuclear power plant in Chernobyl, Russia.