answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The effect of mao's policies had on economic growth is basically that it was destroyed. The lack of modern technology damaged Chinese efforts to increase agricultural and industrial output. Also, he eliminated all incentives for higher production. Mao also tried to replace family life with the life of the communes. Afterwards, many peasants lost their motivation to work for themselves and their family.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

by having low rates

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did Mao's economic policies harm china?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Public choice theory on voting?

Theory basically stating that politicians think solely in the short-term, introducing crowd-pleasing economic policies that may harm the economy in the long term, in order to be re-elected.


What are the kinds of torts?

Negligence Intentional harm to a person Intentional harm to tangible property Strict liability Nuisance Harm to economic interests Harm to intangible property interests


What has the author Harm tho Seeth written?

Harm tho Seeth has written: 'Russlands Haushalte im Transformationsprozess' -- subject(s): Economic aspects, Economic aspects of Households, Households, Income distribution, Poverty, Social service


Why is Obama trying to destroy America?

There is no evidence that he is trying to destroy America, and in fact, even his opponents praise him for keeping America safe; he has been a very effective Commander in Chief, killing some of the major terrorists who tried to harm our country. You may disagree with his economic policies, or believe he has not done a good job as president, but it is wrong and unfair to claim he is intentionally trying to harm this country in any way.


Do gay people harm others by getting married?

Physical harm? Certainly not. Economic harm? Quite the opposite. Emotional harm? Perhaps. But, if prejudiced people are emotionally harmed when a Black family moves into their neighborhood, or when Muslims build a mosque in their city, or when a woman is promoted to supervisor, does that harm justify a constitutional amendment to ban it? I think not.


What is definition of invasion plant?

The federal definition of invasive species is a non-native species whose introduction causes or may cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health.


Did President Jefferson and Jackson's polices benefit the common American and did it harm the elite?

did president Jefferson and Jackson policies benefit common Americans


What has the author Harm Zebregs written?

Harm Zebregs has written: 'Intraregional trade in emerging Asia' -- subject(s): Commerce, Economic integration, International trade 'Long-term international capital movements and technology' -- subject(s): Capital movements, Econometric models, Economic development, Technology transfer


What is social harm?

Social harm refers to the negative consequences or impacts on individuals, groups, or communities resulting from actions or policies within a society. It includes physical, emotional, and psychological harm, as well as the erosion of social cohesion and trust. Examples of social harm can include discrimination, inequality, violence, and exploitation.


Is economic growth more harm than good?

No. Without economic growth the economy of a country will stagnate. If this happens then jobs and sales will be lost which will add to the depression. However it should be regulated in a sustainable manner


What people from ancient China feel about dragons?

The Chinese Lung was peaceful, so the Chinese citizens did not feel any harm for them.


When would you feel it would be justified to go against accepted principles or policy?

Going against accepted principles or policies may be justified when those principles or policies are unethical, harmful, or illegal. It may also be justified when circumstances have significantly changed, making the existing principles or policies no longer relevant or effective. Additionally, if following the principles or policies would result in greater harm than deviating from them, it may be justifiable to do so.