During the Civil War, when President Lincoln made his Emancipation Proclamation, reactions varied greatly. Critics and enemies in the South scorned the move and even ridiculed it, although most of the slaves (quietly) celebrated it. Some Northerners disagreed with it out of fear that it would lengthen the war unnecessarily. Most Northerners, however, rejoiced with the hope that, at last, freedom was going to become reality for all Americans.
BTW, the Emancipation Proclamation explicitly freed no slaves at all in the few slave states still loyal to the Union (to prevent having them rebel too). It only proclaimed the slaves free in those states then in rebellion against the Union (where the Union had absolutely no power to enforce it). So the Emancipation Proclamation actually freed no slaves at all anywhere. The primary purpose of the Emancipation Proclamation was not to free slaves at all or even for US consumption, but as an instrument of international propaganda (particularly on the British who had banned slavery throughout the British Empire several years before, to cease support for the Confederacy and support only the Union) and it worked in that purpose.
During the Civil War, when President Lincoln made his Emancipation Proclamation, reactions varied greatly. Critics and enemies in the South scorned the move and even ridiculed it, although most of the slaves (quietly) celebrated it. Some Northerners disagreed with it out of fear that it would lengthen the war unnecessarily. Most Northerners, however, rejoiced with the hope that, at last, freedom was going to become reality for all Americans.
BTW, the Emancipation Proclamation explicitly freed no slaves at all in the few slave states still loyal to the Union (to prevent having them rebel too). It only proclaimed the slaves free in those states then in rebellion against the Union (where the Union had absolutely no power to enforce it). So the Emancipation Proclamation actually freed no slaves at all anywhere. The primary purpose of the Emancipation Proclamation was not to free slaves at all or even for US consumption, but as an instrument of international propaganda (particularly on the British who had banned slavery throughout the British Empire several years before, to cease support for the Confederacy and support only the Union) and it worked in that purpose.
The emancipation Proclamation doesn't have feeling.....
Many British critics did not approve of the Emancipation Proclamation. They did not feel it was a good idea.
well they feelt pretty good about it
When Lincoln was president, the Emancipation Proclamation was to free all of the slaves in the Confederacy. :)
it was the freedom for people. in declaration of independence it was independence for colonists and for emancipation proclamation is was the slaves
The emancipation Proclamation doesn't have feeling.....
Many British critics did not approve of the Emancipation Proclamation. They did not feel it was a good idea.
The Emancipation Proclomation
well they feelt pretty good about it
people ate alot of pie
When Lincoln was president, the Emancipation Proclamation was to free all of the slaves in the Confederacy. :)
That document signed by Abraham Lincoln is the Emancipation Proclamation.
it was the freedom for people. in declaration of independence it was independence for colonists and for emancipation proclamation is was the slaves
That would be the Emancipation Proclamation.
emancipation proclamation A+ answer
Lincoln. But they were freed by Union troops during their Southern campaigns, not by the Proclamation, which was mainly a tatcic to shame the British out of helping the cause of slavery.
No, Vicksburg's fall had no bearing on the Emancipation Proclamation.