answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Liberal Party favoured social reform, personal liberty, reducing the powers of the Crown and the Church of England (many of them were Nonconformists) and an extension of the electoral franchise. The Conservative Party was just the opposite.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did policies of the British Liberal and Conservative parties differ between 1860 and 1890?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

What are the fundimental differencs between republicans and democrats?

republicans are conservative and do not like change democrats are liberal and embrace change


What is the difference between a labor a conservative?

well labour believe in gay rights, women rights and racial equally. Conservative beleive that if you work hard you get rewarded and are hard on taking money from the hard working community of britan.


What is the Between Loose Interpretation of the constitution and Strict Interpretation of the Constitution?

It perhaps has been said that between loose interpretation and strict interpretation of the Constitution there is the practical matter of applying the Constitution to the business of government. The Constitution of the United States of America is the Supreme Law of that land and guides that nation in their pursuit of life, liberty and happiness. In order to form a more perfect union the people, through the Constitution, granted limited and temporary power to certain government officials so that they might establish justice, provide for the common defense, ensure domestic tranquility and promote the general welfare. But what does it mean to promote the general welfare? How should our elected officials ensure domestic tranquility? How much power should the people grant military leaders in order to provide for a common defense? Exactly how does a government establish justice? These are the goals the people, through constitutional mandate have given their elected officials. How those government officials accomplish or attempt to accomplish those goals depends largely on how they interpret the Constitution.There are those who take a liberal view of the Constitution and others who take a conservative view of the same document and then there is everybody in between. A Liberal will take a loose interpretation of the Constitution as his strategy for accomplishing the necessary goals while a Conservative will adhere strictly to the text to guide them in what must be done. Those in between are not really using the Constitution as their guide. One can not be conservative on some issues and liberal on others without running into logical fallacies. This sort of political declaration only confuses the meaning of liberal and conservative. In the American political landscape if it is not the Constitution that is being conserved then exactly what is being conserved? It is not necessary for a liberal to know they are taking a liberal view of the Constitution in order to be a Liberal, but a Conservative must know that it is the original intent of the Constitution that they are conserving or they become nothing more than just another progressive movement and before you know it the main stream media starts inventing terms like "neo-conservative" and "moderate conservative" or "far right conservative" or even more confusing "left leaning conservative." They all just seem to be descriptions of people in between.There is no better way to illustrate the difference between a liberal and conservative view of the Constitution than by using the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights as an example. The Second Amendment states:A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.A liberal or loose interpretation will place its focus on what is meant by "well regulated militia" and a conservative or strict interpretation will place its focus on "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Of the many arguments made about the Second Amendment the serious ones come down to an interpretation that means that the people have a right to bear arms if they belong to a well regulated militia or an interpretation that means that in order for the people to keep and maintain well regulated militias the people must have the right to keep and bear their own arms. The difference between these two interpretations are radical and extreme.The Conservative, being fundamentally bound by the text which they hope to conserve must concede that "a well regulated militia" certainly can imply some sort of government regulation and such an interpretation should not be construed as a loose interpretation of the text. The conservative will also point out that the text does not imply that the people have a right to keep and bear arms but unequivocally states it and expressly forbids the government from infringing that right. A Liberal will counter that in order for a government to effectively regulate militias they must be able to regulate the right of the people to keep and bear arms. The conservative will claim that this is an infringement upon that right. The Liberal will counter that it is not the right itself that is being regulated but the exercise of that right that is being regulated and then the Conservative will challenge the Liberal to show where in the Constitution that the power to regulate the exercise of freedom was granted to government officials and the debate will continue going back and forth, round and round leaving everyone in between bored and agitated while gradual apathy creeps into their politics and so it remains that it is Liberals and Conservatives who stay the course while everyone in between follows.


Why is the government divided by two arguing parties where their members are forced to choose straight liberal or conservative?

The government is divided by two arguing parties where their members are forced to choose straight liberal or conservative because those are the two ways of living and belief. The two parties are made to choose between the two so that their beliefs and principles are made known by the government and public. This makes choosing the proper people to put into the government system easier for the people based off of the people's needs.


What is the most liberal US state?

Related questions

In pursuing the political strategy known as triangulation President Clinton sought to position himself as somewhere between?

liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans in Congress


What is true about the relationship between British policies in the colonies and the Declaration of Independence?

The Declaration listed colonial complaints about many British policies.


Define Liberal Conservative and Moderate?

A liberal believes that government can be used to alleviate social ills. A conservative holds that individuals are responsible for their own situation, and government should not be involved. A moderate holds an intermediate position between liberal and conservative. Democrats tend to be liberals and Republicans tend to be conservatives. Independents do not mark themselves as members of either of the two parties. A Democrat supports the policies of the Democratic party. Likewise Republicans. Each party has a set of guiding principles, and policy objectives they would like to accomplish. According to modern day university professors, conservative is used to describe any person or organization that is an oppressor, and liberal is used to describe any person or group that is oppressed.


What are the fundimental differencs between republicans and democrats?

republicans are conservative and do not like change democrats are liberal and embrace change


Is McCain considered a liberal moderate or conservative Republican?

In my opinion, I'd put him more to the conservative side, but not exactly on the farthest point. More like less than in between.


What is the difference between a radical and a conservation?

Wrong question. Radicals can be either liberal or conservative; they just have to be radical, that is, pretty extreme.


What was the liberal veiwpoint of the scopes monkey trial?

There was no 'liberal' or conservative' element to the trial. It was trial which prety much featured the debate between the scientific theory of evolution and the lieral interpretation of the Biblical version.


What is the difference between a labor a conservative?

well labour believe in gay rights, women rights and racial equally. Conservative beleive that if you work hard you get rewarded and are hard on taking money from the hard working community of britan.


What is the difference between conservative and progressive conservativ party?

The Conservative Party is a brokerage party that represents many different interests and does not favour government intervention in society at all. The Progressive Conervatives took on more Liberal ideals, especially in terms of the welfare state


What party was david Lloyd george leader of?

David Lloyd George was the Leader of the British Liberal Party between 1926 and 1931.


Why is David Cameron the British Prime Minister?

David Cameron became Prime Minister of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on the 11th May 2010 following a General Election. He successfully created a coalition government between the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrat Party to secure a majority number of seats in the House of Commons.


What is the Difference between pat and pleb?

A Patrician (term coined in Rome's Republic) is a wealthier and more conservative person in the Roman Senate. A plebian (spelling incorrect) is a poorer and more liberal person.