Very little. However, he and his fellow Lord Chamberlain's Men got caught up in politics once when Essex hired them to play the uncut version of Richard II at the Globe, in the hope that the depiction of Richard being deposed would dispose the people to want to depose Queen Elizabeth in favour of Essex. Of course it didn't work even slightly, but the Chamberlain's Men had to undergo some serious grilling by their version of Homeland Security before they were let free.
Shakespeare did not get involved in national politics for two reasons: first, he was not a nobleman and only noblemen could go to court and influence the monarch and second, it was dangerous to make political statements in plays, as the producers of The Isle of Dogs found to their cost. Although Shakespeare's father was involved in local politics, Shakespeare was not really connected enough to Stratford to play a part in their political system, and not respectable enough to be involved in London politics. Also, political parties as we now understand them did not exist in Shakespeare's day.
Hamnet was Shakespeare's son, and it affected Shakespeare financially, although I'm not exactly sure how. William Shakespeare was terrified of the plague because he lost a lot of his brothers and sisters to it during the first major outbreak of the Bubonic plague. This is what Shakespeare's only son, Hamnet, died from, so you can imagine his devastation. Also...affect with an 'a' is a verb, effect with an 'e' is a noun. (Cause and effect, This affects that)
They used their imaginations.
Shakespeare kept away from politics for the most part. The closest he came was when the Earl of Essex commissioned a special performance of Richard II, complete with its deposition scene, by the Lord Chamberlain's Men in order to buck himself up for his attempted coup d'etat. Shakespeare's company were investigated in connection with the matter, but it was found that they were motivated by money and not by politics and they were let go.
John Shakespeare was very interested in local politics in Stratford, and was at one point the High Bailiff of the Town, the equivalent of the mayor.
Shakespeare's Politics - book - was created in 1964.
== ==
Illergic
Shakespeare did not get involved in national politics for two reasons: first, he was not a nobleman and only noblemen could go to court and influence the monarch and second, it was dangerous to make political statements in plays, as the producers of The Isle of Dogs found to their cost. Although Shakespeare's father was involved in local politics, Shakespeare was not really connected enough to Stratford to play a part in their political system, and not respectable enough to be involved in London politics. Also, political parties as we now understand them did not exist in Shakespeare's day.
Shakespeare created over 3,000 words that are used in our everyday speech.
Hamnet was Shakespeare's son, and it affected Shakespeare financially, although I'm not exactly sure how. William Shakespeare was terrified of the plague because he lost a lot of his brothers and sisters to it during the first major outbreak of the Bubonic plague. This is what Shakespeare's only son, Hamnet, died from, so you can imagine his devastation. Also...affect with an 'a' is a verb, effect with an 'e' is a noun. (Cause and effect, This affects that)
nto politics but it was geography
John Shakespeare was very interested in local politics in Stratford, and was at one point the High Bailiff of the Town, the equivalent of the mayor.
They used their imaginations.
It paved the way for antislavery politics.
2000
effects of globalization in the philippines on politics