It wasn't involved at all. The war started because of the allied agreements had to be enforced.
It was World War 1. They Didn't Have A Take In World War 2.
his assasination lead to austro-hungarian empire declaring war on serbia. the allied powers stood with serbia in the war and the central powers (germany) austro-hungary. causing world war 1.
the treaty of Versailles
Because Adolf Hitler was talking over all of country all over the world.
The Russian Revolution did not lead to World War 1, as the Bolshevik Revolution took place in 1917, 3 years into the war.
T.S. Eliot described the postwar world as a wasteland devoid of spiritual meaning and moral values, characterized by disillusionment, fragmentation, and decay. His influential poem "The Waste Land" reflects his vision of the shattered society and human condition in the aftermath of World War I.
It was World War 1. They Didn't Have A Take In World War 2.
it lead to world war 3
how might nationalism lead to war
Mahatma Ghandi was the spiritual leader. The Brits ruled India during world war 2 and there was no dictator.
No, he was elected later, after World War I.
Australia.
World War I
Possibly but if there was a third world war it is highly unlikely that the second world war would be the cause.
spanish civil war
T.S. Eliot's literature reflected the disillusionment and fragmentation of society in the aftermath of World War I. His poems often explored themes of alienation, spiritual crisis, and the decay of modern civilization. Through his work, Eliot captured the anxiety and dislocation of the modern individual in a rapidly changing world.
The military helped to make the first world war break out and the countries who were fighting felt intimidated by them and they started another war inside of the first world war which lead to militarism being on of the causes of the outbreak.