The term scientific revolution is vague. do you mean the enlightenment< when such men as Boyle and Newton started questioning and analyzing the processes of nature? somewhat oddly, and maybe this was just in the vanguard of progressivism- modernism or whatever you choose to call it, but there was little religious opposition to advances in technology - particulaily in communications field as these devices such as the Telegraph, telephone ( dial a prayer?) printing machinery- could be used to spread the gospel. in fact the Battle Hymn of the Republic seems to allude to the telegraph ( inaccurately one might add, as even with wireless there are no visible sparks) in the line about the ( Dim and Flaring Lamps!) okay- forward march! but then about ten years after the civil war- impacted Evolution or (Evil-you-shun) times changed. The churches got on a common ground and generally opposed the Darwinian model and it got more than a little ugly.- this spread to a distrust of science- all of this long before the advent of Nuclear Weapons or Gas warfare.
In the end, Galileo did not persuade the Church to stay out of the controversy, but ... Urban was soft on defending the church, he reacted out of anger and fear. ... by Galileo in his previous work.
Connections to Scientific Revolution: The Enlightenment was a program to reform political, economic, and social aspects of European life by using the Scientific method established during the Scientific Revolution. The movement was based on the discoveries and knowledge of the Scientific Revolution.
At the time of the scientific revolution, sources of knowledge dealing primarily with mathematics and astronomy were most often referred to. The scientific revolution began in the mid-1500s.
The people who were part of the scientific revolution was mainly thinkers. Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, and Kepler.
the scientific revolution was believed to change history of course and people socially and intellectually
The Scientific Revolution started because current scientific theories would not explain what the Egyptian astronomer Ptolemy found. This lead to the advancement of a Scientific Revolution to study of his ideas.
The Catholic Church initially viewed the scientific revolution with caution and suspicion due to its challenge to traditional beliefs. However, some early scientists, like Galileo, faced opposition from the Church when their ideas conflicted with religious teachings. Over time, the Church's stance evolved, leading to greater acceptance and incorporating scientific advancements into its worldview.
A lot of what the church teaches is not scientific.
The "Scientific Revolution" did not weaken the Catholic Church, the Scientific Revolution was brought about by the Catholic Church. Nearly everyone who contributed to it for centuries was Catholic, in many notable cases, they were even clergy or monks. People of a protestant or secular viewpoint often make the claim that the scientific revolution led to a weakening of the Church because the Church relied on things not seen, while science relied on provable facts, but this is a straw argument, and doesn't touch the reality that everyone actually doing the science was a Catholic.
Because they were believed to go against the church. For a society that was tied to the church in their everyday life, the scientific world was scary and something to be avoided.
the teaching of the church.
They promoted learning outside the control of the government and Catholic Church.
Church leaders felt that the new views challenged religious teaching.
Mostly because the "church" kept insisting that their stories were true even when they had been proven untrue.
They promoted learning outside the control of the government and Catholic Church.
Their independence from government and church control.
Their independence from government and church control.
The Scientific Revolution was a conflict between authority and evidence. Authority came in the form of the Church, which did not want to accept new scientific ideas. Evidence came in the form of experiments and observations that scientists were coming up with that were proven true repeatedly.