answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

By 287 B.C., all male Roman citizens were supposedly equal under the law. in reality, however, a few wealthy patrician and plebeian families formed a new senatorial ruling class that came to dominate the political offices. Therefore, Rome did not become a democracy.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did the differences between plebeians and patricans prevent rome from becoming a true democracy?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Ancient History

Who in the roman republic had the right to vote and become a consul?

The patricians had the right to vote, as did the plebeians and equites and all the Roman citizens of the first class. Rome was a republic and all citizens could vote, depending on their class of citizenship. As far as becoming consul, anyone could run for the office providing he had completed the other offices leading up to consulship. In the later republic there was a law that one consul had to be a plebeian.


Why was cleopatra successful as a queen?

She was not a successful queen. She was only successful at becoming a queen.She was not a successful queen. She was only successful at becoming a queen.She was not a successful queen. She was only successful at becoming a queen.She was not a successful queen. She was only successful at becoming a queen.She was not a successful queen. She was only successful at becoming a queen.She was not a successful queen. She was only successful at becoming a queen.She was not a successful queen. She was only successful at becoming a queen.She was not a successful queen. She was only successful at becoming a queen.She was not a successful queen. She was only successful at becoming a queen.


What was Cleisthenes known for?

Cleisthenes was important because he was known as the reformer of the constitution of Athens. He also began to point Athens in the way of becoming a democracy. He is known as "the father of Athenian democracy."


What did Cleopatra do before being queen?

We know nothing of what Cleopatra did before becoming queen. She steps into history as a grown woman 22 years old.We know nothing of what Cleopatra did before becoming queen. She steps into history as a grown woman 22 years old.We know nothing of what Cleopatra did before becoming queen. She steps into history as a grown woman 22 years old.We know nothing of what Cleopatra did before becoming queen. She steps into history as a grown woman 22 years old.We know nothing of what Cleopatra did before becoming queen. She steps into history as a grown woman 22 years old.We know nothing of what Cleopatra did before becoming queen. She steps into history as a grown woman 22 years old.We know nothing of what Cleopatra did before becoming queen. She steps into history as a grown woman 22 years old.We know nothing of what Cleopatra did before becoming queen. She steps into history as a grown woman 22 years old.We know nothing of what Cleopatra did before becoming queen. She steps into history as a grown woman 22 years old.


What is a scribe and explain the processes of becoming a scribe?

in ancient Egypt, only men could be scribes and as children, they studied over 700 hieroglyphs in a few years before becoming a scribe

Related questions

Which describes a change that occurred in Rome about 100 B.C.?

Patricians were becoming wealthier and plebeians were becoming poorer.


What is a liberal democracy?

What America is becoming!


How did the role of the plebeians in roman government change over time?

Once the Plebeians gained their civil rights, they were able to hold public office and may of them rose to important positions and even counsuls. Marc Antony is an example of a man from a plebeian family becoming a counsul.


How did the role of the plebeians in the Roman government change over time?

Once the Plebeians gained their civil rights, they were able to hold public office and may of them rose to important positions and even counsuls. Marc Antony is an example of a man from a plebeian family becoming a counsul.


Where does the commas belong in this sentence The two sisters joined together as one after becoming torn apart because of their differences from this conflict?

The sentence that you gave me is gramatically wrong but this is the best I can do: The two sisters joined together as one, after becoming torn apart, because of their differences from this conflict


Is Thailand still rule by a king?

Thailand is currently a Consitutional Monarchy.


What statement best describes a difference between a presidential system of democracy and a parliamentary system of democracy?

The widely used definition of Presidential Democracy is "A system of government where the executive branch exists separately from a legislature" whereas, Parliamentary Democracy is defined as "A party with greatest representation in the parliament and its leader becoming the prime minister or chancellor".


Was Hirohito's country a democracy or communist state?

Emperor Hirohito's Japan prior to World War II was not a democracy nor was it a communist state; it was a fascist theocracy. After World War II, the US Occupation of Japan led to Japan becoming a democracy under Emperor Hirohito's watch.


What happen to Mongolian in the late 1980s?

A peaceful, democratic revolution changed the country's political system in the late 1980s. New Democratic and Freedom parties were created, and in July 1990, the first democratic general election took place in Mongolia. It became a parliamentary republic with a president and multiparty system. At present, Mongolia is making a transition from the centrally planned economy of its Soviet-style past to a free market economy.Hope this helps.


What type of government did Belgium have before its constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy?

Before becoming an independent country in 1831 it was under foreign rule.


What stops the taoiseach becoming a dictator?

Ireland is a democracy. The Taoiseach is just the head of government, not the head of state. The Taoiseach is answerable to the Irish parliament.


How did the difference between plebeians and and patricians prevent Rome from becoming a true democracy?

Rome would have not been a true democracy even without the Conflict of the Orders between patricians (the aristocracy) and plebeians (the commoners, both rich and poor). If anything this conflict made Rome a bit more democratic. The Romans were not interested in democracy. At that time it was a Greek concept which meant power by the people in a literal way. The people made all the decisions by voting in the assembly of the people and the executive implemented the wishes of the people. Athens' democracy started around the same time as the establishment of the Roman Republic. The Romans were not interested in this and continued their own traditions. The Romans replaced the king with two annually elected consuls. For the rest they retained the institutions of the late monarchy. The unelected senate remained the advisory body, but for the consuls, instead of the king. The popular assemblies, the Assembly of the Solders and the Assembly of the Tribes, were retained. The assembly of the soldiers, which was the most important one, had a voting system which was weighted in favour of the rich and the poor hardly ever voted. It voted for war or peace and it elected the consuls. In the Early Republic, the patricians came to monopolise the consulship and the seats of the senate. The Conflict of the Orders made Rome a bit more democratic. Through this the rich plebeians obtained assess to the consulship and the other offices of state which were created as the republic developed and some of the priesthoods. The plebeians also created their own assembly, the Plebeian Council. This assembly became the main body for voting on bills (previously it had been the Assembly of the Soldiers) which eventually were given the force of laws which were binding on all Roman citizens, including the patricians (originally they were binding only on the plebeians). These gains of the plebeians made Rome an oligarchy. The access to the offices of state and the senate was sought by the rich plebeians who were the leaders of the plebeian movement. What the poor plebeians sought through this movement was different. They fought to force the Roman state to address their economic grievances, mainly indebtedness and more land for farmers whose plots of land were not sufficient to make a proper living. When the rich plebeians obtained power-sharing with the patricians they were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy and were given equite (cavalryman) status, which was the second highest ranking order in Roman society. At this point the rich plebeians turned their backs on the poor whose grievances were never addressed properly.