he didn't either an archer shot him in the eye and pierced his brain or he was lanced
and disembowled head chopped off and leg cut off or both
They invaded because edward promised throne to him
Harold didn't have that much good luck. Although he won a battle against Harold Hardrada which meant him and his army had some experience on what it was like in a battle so it would be easier for him to kill William of Normandy in the battle of Hastings's. Thank-you
Harold Godwinson was killed rather by the more popular suggestion of an arrow to his eye in the battle of Hastings, or getting struck down off his horse in the battle of Hastings. Harold Hardrada was killed by Harold's troops at Stamford bridge, believed to have been shot in the neck then attacked by a group of English troops. He was a very tough man so this was probably necessary.
he killed many of the English, and then he finally reached King Harold, and then killed him. Once King Harold was dead, William the Conqueror became the new King of England.
You need to be clearer on which HaroldHarold Hadrada or Harold Godwinson. but William foughtand killed Harold g because he couldn't claim the throne until Harold g was dead. so he Killed Harold to become king.does that answer your question
Harold did not kill William. William killed Harold by shooting an arrow in his eye.
There is no historic record that William the Conquerer killed anyone personally with his own hands. At the Battle of Hastings in 1066 William's invading army killed many defenders of England in the army of King Harold.
Yes, Harold Godwinson did not try to kill King Edward. In fact, Harold was a prominent English nobleman who served as an advisor to King Edward before becoming King of England himself.
the normans will kill you
ffgfghfcghc
Yes
Harald Hadrada was killed by Harold Godwinson (also known as Harold II) When an arrow pierced through his throat.
Bridget Bishop
he murdered five
Harold A. Ballitch II md
yes
The French verb "tuer" means "to kill" in English.