Different creatures had different areas of land that they had to inhabit and the plant life became different because it could mingle with other forms of plant life so the animals had to adapt to eat the new kinds of plants. Different animals evolved because of the continued separation of them with their ancestors.
I have the same question. It is incredible that some things look similar in different continents. When America was discovered, they had a language, a religion, a political system... they used clothes, fire, weapons. They lived in houses and they had the family... They are plants and animals... They, probably, could write... Is not amazing? It is!
Different creatures had different areas of land that they had to inhabit and the plant life became different because it could mingle with other forms of plant life so the animals had to adapt to eat the new kinds of plants. Different animals evolved because of the continued separation of them with their ancestors.
populations adapted to the new conditions of each region :) . _ NovaNET
Different creatures had different areas of land that they had to inhabit and the plant life became different because it could mingle with other forms of plant life so the animals had to adapt to eat the new kinds of plants. Different animals evolved because of the continued separation of them with their ancestors.
what affect tectonics have on evolution of new spiecies
The term coevolution (affect) is used to describe cases where two (or more) species reciprocally affect each other's evolution. So for example, an evolutionary change in the morphology of a plant, might affect the morphology of an herbivore that eats the plant, which in turn might affect the evolution of the plant, which might affect the evolution of the herbivore and so on.
Technologies that affect biological diversity include genetic modification. This will cause a loss in biodiversity.
enzyme
Interesting question but too tough to answer. There are a lot of things that affect how we act and if we knew what they were we could control ourselves, right? I also think there are a lot of new things that affect human nature (its not just beer and coffee anymore), so it is even more difficult. But I somehow feel you are asking a retorical question.
The government would have become a tyranny if there was no separation of powers
Separation does not affect ownership. Only the parties or the court can change the ownership.
No