archaeologists draw conclusons about prehistoric people by finding information from long ago.
Archaeologists draw conclusions about prehistoric people by analyzing artifacts, ecofacts, and features found at archaeological sites. They consider factors such as the context and spatial relationships of these items to understand prehistoric activities, social structures, beliefs, and technologies. Additionally, they may use scientific techniques such as radiocarbon dating, DNA analysis, and isotopic analysis to further understand prehistoric populations.
Archaeologists draw conclusions about ancient civilizations by analyzing artifacts, structures, and other remains. They use scientific methods such as carbon dating, DNA analysis, and isotopic analysis to determine the age of the findings. By combining this data with historical records and other evidence, archaeologists can piece together a picture of how the civilization lived, thrived, and interacted with their environment.
They compare and contrast the ideas from multiple resources
Archaeologists and detectives both seek to uncover and interpret clues and evidence to understand past events. They rely on critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and attention to detail to reconstruct and analyze historical contexts or events. Both professions use a combination of scientific methods and expertise to piece together information and draw conclusions.
Prehistoric men used natural materials like charcoal and earth pigments to draw on cave walls. They depicted animals, handprints, and abstract symbols in caves like Lascaux and Altamira. These cave paintings offer insight into the life and beliefs of early humans.
Among the remains found in Border Cave, they found the bones of a baby. Near the skeleton of the the baby was a beautiful bead made from seashell. The archaeologists think that the people who lived there cared deeply for the baby, otherwise, why would they bothered to bury it?
By looking and finding things that have been left behind by the early peoplesArchaeologist draw conclusions about an ancient civilization by analyzing artifacts discovered on sites
As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.
pencil
These should be based on some evidence but all to often people draw conclusions based on prejudices.
It means to make some hypotheses about an event or events. These should be based on some evidence but all to often people draw conclusions based on prejudices.
Without the excerpt provided, it is impossible to draw any conclusions about the author.
because my face was on the wall
Inferences
Draw conclusions based on details from the reading.
They explore a subject from different angles to draw conclusions.
Many do. You can't draw conclusions about 'all' from a small sample.
When you think you have found the answer to your question.