0
Laboratory tools makes the one thing be easier to identify.
laboratory tools make easier the job of scientist on their experiments
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoWithout some tools further biological studies could not be conducted. Without microscopes we could not see the cell. Without staining we could not visualize/localize protein activity. Without PCR we could not analyze the genetic structure of an organism. Without protein assays (eg. ELISAs, Western blots, SDS-PAGE gels) we couldn't examine protein presence.
Bunsen burners, ethanol, sterile equipment are all necessary to study cells and prevent contamination. Pipettes, Burettes, Plates are all necessary to measure distinct amounts. Scales are necessary when creating solutions with exacting composition.
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoThe tools for a biologist in a lab are essential for keeping aseptic technique, to allow for perfect growing conditions when required. The laboratory equipment helps for proper observation of a subject, proper storage, and helps from contamination of the material to the outside.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago- because if the scientist have no laboratory tools they cannot discover a thing that is useful
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoits help with getting p***y and with f*****g b***h
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoLab tools can greatly improve the observations made by a scientist. This is due to the fact that the lab tools can quantify the changes the scientist is seeing, resulting in usable data.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do laboratory tools improve the observations made by a scientist?
Primarily by increasing accuracy, and next by increasing efficiency.
What observation made in the 1600s and 1700s led som people to believe that there was a vital force in the air?
the observations made in the 1600s and the 1700s were that of spontaneous generation. This was the "vital force".
Who is mathiew schlider?
A Botonist and Scientist that concluded that all plants are made up of cells
What scientist determined that all plants are made of cells?
Matthias Schleiden
When did genetics start as a science?
gregor mendel, the czech monk made the first reproducible observations of genetics. He could not exactly explain them however. From: Junior Geneticboy
How do laboratory tools help improve the observations made by the scientist?
laboratory tools help to make easier the job of scientist and student on the experiment....
How do laboratory tools improve observations made by a scientist?
Primarily by increasing accuracy, and next by increasing efficiency.
How do laboratory equipment help improve the observations made by a scientist?
kc ang baho ng pekpek nla ..
How do laboratory tools improve the observations made by a scientist?
Primarily by increasing accuracy, and next by increasing efficiency.
Why is careful obersavation important to being a scientist?
A scientist may create an hypothesis on the basis of their observations. If their observations are carelessly made or recorded then any hypotheses they offer will be inaccurate reflections of nature. A scientist may alternatively collect observations to test an hypothesis. If these observations are carelessly made or recorded then the conclusions that the scientist makes about the hypothesis could very well be incorrect. At the very least the conclusions they draw would not be based on sound evidence (because the observations are unsound).
Which scientist made observations about water that also helped explain airflow?
bernoulli
Who was an Italian scientist who made astronomical observations that supported the theories of Copernicus?
Galileo Galilei
What are observations made with tools called?
They are called measurements. Like witha ruler or stop watch.
Which scientist made the first observations about magnetism 2500 years ago?
i need to know the exact same thing
Why do scientist insist that observations be made by at least two independent observers?
In order to minimize errors and confirm the results.
Tycho Brahe came to the wrong conclusions about the motion of the planets so all his years of work were wasted true or false?
False. No scientist gets everything EXACTLY right, not even Newton or Einstein or Hawking. Brahe's observations were astoundingly accurate, and he interpreted them as well as he could, but his years of painstaking observations made it possible for others to improve on his analytical work. Wasted? Not hardly!
How are australopithecus different from apes?
Actually they have different hand joints which allowed them to make tools. But scientist don't know if they actually made tools. Also, they stood upright.
