By examining fossils and by determining their relative and absolute ages, scientists have collected evidence that supports the theory that species changed over time.
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
No, they are not evidence for ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny.
Proteins reflect DNA sequences, so scientists study proteins to look for genetic similarities and differences in organisms.
Evolution
This question can not be answered without more information.
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
No, they are not evidence for ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny.
Proteins reflect DNA sequences, so scientists study proteins to look for genetic similarities and differences in organisms.
DNA molecules contain the assembly instructions for every living creature. Scientists compare DNA from ancient and present creatures to identify genetic similarities among species. The genetic similarities among species is the main evidence of evolution theory.
Evolution
i do not have any idea
Fossils can be used as evidence for evolution because they can show the development of a species over a long period of time.
Related species have similar embryos.
organic evolution is thus the progressive development of animals and plant from ancestors of different forms and function
Evidence, not proof. Scientists do not prove things. Your coccyx for one bit of evidence, This is the " stump " of a vestigial tail that is now used for another purpose in humans; to help with sitting. Sometimes this tail does grow out in child development. This is evidence of the concept of evolutionary common ancestry.
stoned monkeys rule the world
dilesindrom