answersLogoWhite

0

First, we want to set up a recurrence relation. If we consider the best-case for the quicksort, that is, that each partition splits the collection in 1/2 (not a valid assumption), then (look at a recursive quicksort algorithm):

The partition requires about n comparisons. It is then left to sort 2 collections of size n/2. So:

T(n) = 2*T(n/2) + n

Use repeated substitution, or the "master theorem" or whatever it's called, a generalisation of closed forms, or draw a tree, or use the accounting method, or guess at the answer, prove it by induction.

Now, we need to consider the worst case. The partition still costs the same (about n comparisons), but the partition didn't yield 2 nice-sized sub-collections to sort. Instead, we have a single sub-array to sort, of size n-1 . So now the recurrence relation looks like:

T(n) = T(n-1) + n

Solve this in your favorite way.

Now, on average, how good is your algorithm? That depends on how well you choose your pivot. You can do some reasoning, or, you can run some nice experiments.

Have fun.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the time complexity of quicksort algorithm?

The time complexity of the quicksort algorithm is O(n log n) in the average case and O(n2) in the worst case.


What is the worst-case time complexity of quicksort?

The worst-case time complexity of quicksort is O(n2), where n is the number of elements in the array being sorted.


What is the time complexity of quicksort when the first element is chosen as the pivot?

The time complexity of quicksort when the first element is chosen as the pivot is O(n2) in the worst-case scenario.


What is the Big O notation of Quicksort algorithm in terms of time complexity?

The Big O notation of Quicksort algorithm is O(n log n) in terms of time complexity.


What is the time complexity of Quicksort algorithm in terms of Big O notation?

The time complexity of Quicksort algorithm is O(n log n) in terms of Big O notation.


What is the recurrence relation for the quicksort algorithm and how does it affect the time complexity of the sorting process?

The recurrence relation for the quicksort algorithm is T(n) T(k) T(n-k-1) O(n), where k is the position of the pivot element. This relation affects the time complexity of quicksort by determining the number of comparisons and swaps needed to sort the elements. The average time complexity of quicksort is O(n log n), but in the worst-case scenario, it can be O(n2) if the pivot selection is not optimal.


What is the memory complexity of quicksort algorithm?

The memory complexity of the quicksort algorithm is O(log n) in the best and average cases, and O(n) in the worst case.


What is the space complexity of quicksort algorithm?

The space complexity of the quicksort algorithm is O(log n) in the best and average cases, and O(n) in the worst case.


Which sorting algorithm is more efficient for large datasets: quicksort or heapsort?

Quicksort is generally more efficient than heapsort for large datasets due to its average time complexity of O(n log n) compared to heapsort's O(n log n) worst-case time complexity.


Which sorting algorithm is more efficient for large datasets: heapsort vs quicksort?

Quicksort is generally more efficient than heapsort for large datasets due to its average-case time complexity of O(n log n) compared to heapsort's O(n log n) worst-case time complexity.


Why is Quicksort's time complexity O(n log n)?

Quicksort's time complexity is O(n log n) because it divides the input array into smaller subarrays and recursively sorts them. The partitioning step takes O(n) time, and on average, the algorithm splits the array into two equal parts. This results in a logarithmic number of levels in the recursion tree, leading to a time complexity of O(n log n).


Which sorting algorithm is more efficient for small datasets: quicksort or insertion sort?

For small datasets, insertion sort is generally more efficient than quicksort. This is because insertion sort has a lower overhead and performs well on small lists due to its simplicity and low time complexity.