1,2,3,4 and 1,2,3,4,and (I think)(one beat per second) Did this help? I HOPE SO!!
It depends how fast you count; if you count one number each second it is 1000 seconds; if you count very fast, like 4 numbers per second, you can count to 1000 in about 4 minutes
Count the cycles per second. it's formula=1/time
You don't A count per second is a measure of how many decays occur within a second. A sievert is a measure of the dose equivalent. This requires knowledge of the isotope, the organism or part of the organism which is receiving the dose, the weight of the organism and the weighting factors which accompany them.
If you counted 1 number per second, it would take 63 years to count to 2 billion.
If you counted 1 number per second, it would take 3200 years to count to 100 billion.
the number of hertz = count per second
1 per second
you would have to count 5.78703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703703... numbers every second
It depends how fast you count; if you count one number each second it is 1000 seconds; if you count very fast, like 4 numbers per second, you can count to 1000 in about 4 minutes
Michael Flatley, known for his Irish dance performances, is said to be able to tap his feet at an impressive speed of up to 35 taps per second. However, exact speeds may vary depending on the specific performance or routine.
Count the cycles per second. it's formula=1/time
you just count per second and that's your answer
You don't A count per second is a measure of how many decays occur within a second. A sievert is a measure of the dose equivalent. This requires knowledge of the isotope, the organism or part of the organism which is receiving the dose, the weight of the organism and the weighting factors which accompany them.
If you count at 5 numbers per second it will take over 6000 years!
It would take a million seconds = 16666.667 minutes = 277.778 hours = 11.57 days approx. This assumes (a) that you can count 1 per second which may not be realistic for large numbers and (b) that you can count for that length of time without stopping.
a long time
Per Mel Brooks in the YF commentary, he did bits and pieces of it, but most of the taps were added in during post-production (in otherwords, someone else- presumably a professional tap dancer- did them).