There are a number of possible configurations for the drawing and the question does not make clear which is intended. One possibility is that of a large square which contains a medium sized square whose vertices are at the midpoints of the sides of the larger square and which, in turn, contains a smaller square defined in the same way.
One way to draw this figure would be to start at the midpoint of a side of the largest square and go all the way round it. Then move on to the middle square and draw only half of one side. Move to the smallest square and go all round it. Then continue and complete the middle square.
If the number inside the radical is a perfect square or a ratio of perfect squares.
9 *snicker* trick question.
17 squares. 1 of size 4x4, 4 of size 3x3, 9 of size 2x2, 16 of size 1x1 Total 30 but that depends on a particular interpretation of the question (16 squares arranged in a 4x4 group). If the 16 are arranged in a row, then they might be regarded as a rectangle and you only have 1 square (the box). If you define the box to be a real 3 dimensional box then the box itself has 6 or 5 squares depending on if it has a lid or not.
That's because "perimeter" means the distance around something - not the spaces inside. If you count squares inside a figure, you are finding the AREA, not the PERIMETER.
You cannot get an accurate measure of the area without pi. If you are interested in an approximation, you could divide the circle up into tiny squares of some fixed area (their size would depend on how big the original circle was). Then count the number of squares where half or more is inside the circle and multiply by the area of each square. That will give you an estimate of the area of the circle. You could make an approximation with inscribed and circumscribed polygons (which are the sum of a number of isosceles triangles) and average the two areas, increasing the number of sides of the polygons to increase accuracy (that is the way the early Greek mathematicians did it). Much easier and quicker to use pi!
use a pencil
None unless you draw some inside. ^ Terrible answer: There can be many different numbers of squares inside a circle. As the size of the squares goes to zero, the number of squares goes to infinity.
You count the inside squares of the figure.
volume
You measure how many units will fit inside of the area. For example, if you own a plot of land and want to know the area in square feet, construct a lot of squares that are one foot square. Then put as many of those square as will fit into the plot without any overlapping or any gaps. Count the number of squares that fit into the plot.
Old one. Make a square out of four squares, then remove two adjacent inside toothpicks. This leaves a large square with a small square inside.
The radius of the largest circle you can fit is 2.72cm
usually its for marking a right angle
Remove all of the inside sticks... Try this (and please ignore the dots... I couldn't get it to space properly without them): ___ ___ ___ |.... |.... |.... | ___ ___ ___ |.... |.... |.... | ___ ___ ___ |.... |.... |.... | ___ ___ ___ Changes to ___ ___ ___ |................. | .......___ |.... |.... |.... | .......___ |................. | ___ ___ ___ if you take out the 8 lines along the inside track: which makes two squares that don't touch each other.
................... . . . . . ................... . . . . . . . . ................... . . . . . ................... Overlapping two big squares you'll get the third square, a little one.
As many as you want.As many as you want.As many as you want.As many as you want.
36 one-meter squares will fit into 36 square meters