An object is in motion when it changes its position with respect to a given frame of reference (usually it is the observer or a fixed point in space). Motion can only be visualized when it is seen against a frame of reference. but as we move on to advanced physics, we see that there is no point we can consider as stationary.
Einstein solved this porblem while proposing his theory of relativity. he said everything floats in 'luminiferous ehter'. this is supposed to be fixed, and not move. so, we can take it as a frame of reference, when considering problems involving no physical object at rest. Imagine the ether to be any point in space, but make all observations from the same point.
Because of its velocity (velocity is the rate of change of position), an object will move. An object is stationary if it has no velocity because it will not be able to move without velocity. Therefore, you can tell that an object has moved because of velocity.
Movement can only be defined in terms of something else. If you imagine a universe with only one object in it, the concept of movement is meaningless. If you add a second object, then movement can be defined by establishing one as a non-moving frame of reference. It doesn't matter which one. They can both be moving only if you add a third frame of reference. So motion is always relative to a designated rest frame.
You cannot sense constant velocity. If you are in a closed capsule moving through space, with no nearby external visual references, you will have no sense of motion. Only a change in motion, the onset of acceleration, gives you a sense of movement.
if you are on it you don't. if you are on something else you don't, however you can know if the two things are moving relative to each other.
This is an important aspect of Special Relativity.
because its not in that place no more dummy
when it isn't in the sam place as before
Change of position relative to another object
you now this because speed is how fast an object is ''moving'' and motion is when an object is ''moving''
The object will be in both rotational and translational equilibrium and will not be moving.
this object that appears to stay in place is a reference point.
You need to improve your question and give more details
The object would be moving.
The object does not appear to be staying in one place. Or, it is moving if it's distance from another object is changing.
Change of position relative to another object
If you know the speed and direction of the object's motion, then you know its velocity.
you now this because speed is how fast an object is ''moving'' and motion is when an object is ''moving''
velocity
Then we will know the object's velocity.
we can say an object is moving if it changes it constant environmnent or background
The object will be in both rotational and translational equilibrium and will not be moving.
It is easier to push a moving object than an object of the same mass because the weight on the moving object is less and out more.... I know this doesn't quite make sense but email me at oliviabastianich@Gmail.com for a better explenation... i will help in the next 12 hours!
It's important to know that you reference point is moving because if an object is in motion and if it changes position it is relevant to a reference point.
Only if you know your location (the coordinate on the distance scale and the time scale) where "you" are can you infer if the object is moving towards you (the absolute distance to the object is decreasing) or away from you (the distance is increasing).