Certainly. Say you have an object that has been falling through the air for a long time, say a skydiver. After falling for a long time, the skydiver will fall at a constant velocity. This is called terminal velocity, and this is when the air resistance pushing up around the skydiver is equal to the force of gravity pulling the skydiver down. The skydiver is not accelerating. By using F= ma, with zero acceleration, there is zero net force. The skydiver is moving as if there are no forces acting on the skydiver.
Doubling the force acting on a moving object would cause the object to accelerate at a faster rate, leading to an increase in its speed. This is in accordance with Newton's second law of motion, which states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the force acting on it.
An object in equilibrium is not moving, as all the forces acting on the object are balanced. If the object were to be in motion, it would no longer be in equilibrium as there would be an unbalanced force acting on it.
No, centripetal force is not acting when a body is moving in a straight line. Centripetal force is required to keep an object moving in a curved path.
If the force acting upon an object are balanced then the object must not be accelerating
The result of a force acting on a moving object over time is a change in the object's velocity. This change can be an increase or decrease in speed, a change in direction, or both, depending on the magnitude and direction of the force.
The object will move faster
Doubling the force acting on a moving object would cause the object to accelerate at a faster rate, leading to an increase in its speed. This is in accordance with Newton's second law of motion, which states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the force acting on it.
An object in equilibrium is not moving, as all the forces acting on the object are balanced. If the object were to be in motion, it would no longer be in equilibrium as there would be an unbalanced force acting on it.
If the net force acting on an object is 0 N, the object will continue to move at a constant velocity in a straight line according to Newton's First Law of Motion.
No, centripetal force is not acting when a body is moving in a straight line. Centripetal force is required to keep an object moving in a curved path.
If the force acting upon an object are balanced then the object must not be accelerating
The result of a force acting on a moving object over time is a change in the object's velocity. This change can be an increase or decrease in speed, a change in direction, or both, depending on the magnitude and direction of the force.
Because F=ma, If an object is moving at a constant velocity(speed), then there can be no net force acting on the object. This means that there is a dispersive force i.e Drag or friction acting on the object equal to 2 but in the opposite direction to motion.
Yes, an object can be moving at a constant velocity (i.e., moving with no acceleration) and have a net force of zero. This occurs when the forces acting on the object are balanced, such as when an object is in equilibrium.
If the force acting on an object moving in a circle is removed, the object will continue to move in a straight line tangent to the circle at the point where the force was removed, due to its inertia. This is governed by Newton's first law of motion.
If there is no force acting on an object, it will remain in its state of motion (either at rest or moving at a constant velocity) according to Newton's first law of motion.
The object is accelerated in the direction of the net (or resultant) force.