answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How does Beveridge answer the charge that governing people without their consent is wrong the charge that governing people without their consent is wrong?

He compares the people of the Philippines to children who are governed without consent


What was Beveridge answer the charge that governing people without their consent is wrong?

He pointed out that the United States already does this with Native Americans.


How does albert j beveridge answer the charge that governing people without their consent is wrong?

He pointed out that the United States already does this with Native Americans. He also compared the people in the Philippines to children, who are governed without consent.


How does Beveridge answer the charge that governing people without their consent is wrongAsk us anything?

Beveridge addresses the charge that governing people without their consent is wrong by emphasizing the importance of the greater good and the necessity of governance for social order and stability. He argues that certain circumstances, such as war or crisis, may justify overriding individual consent for the collective benefit. Furthermore, he posits that consent is often implicit in the social contract, where citizens accept governance in exchange for protection and services. Ultimately, Beveridge suggests that the moral imperative of ensuring the welfare of the community can supersede individual consent in specific situations.


How does Beverridge answer the charge the governing people with out their consent is wrong?

Beveridge addresses the charge of governing people without their consent by emphasizing the importance of the social contract and the role of government in ensuring the common good. He argues that legitimate authority arises from the consent of the governed, and that when a government fails to represent the people's interests, it loses its moral justification to rule. Beveridge suggests that active engagement and participation in governance are essential for maintaining legitimacy and accountability. Thus, he upholds the principle that consent is foundational to the ethical exercise of political power.


How does beveridge answer the charge that governing people without their consent in wrong?

(apex) Answer: He says some people are not capable of self-government.


How does beaver Ridge answer the charge that governing people without their consent is wrong?

Beaver Ridge addresses the charge that governing people without their consent is wrong by emphasizing the importance of social contracts and collective agreements. It argues that governance can be justified if it serves the common good and protects the rights of individuals, even if not everyone explicitly consents. Additionally, Beaver Ridge might suggest that the legitimacy of authority can stem from democratic processes or the general will of the community, thereby mitigating the issue of consent through representation and participation. Ultimately, it posits that effective governance prioritizes the welfare of the populace, which can validate the exercise of authority.


How does beverage answer the charge that governing people about their consent is wrong?

Beverage argues that governing people without their consent is inherently unjust, as it undermines individual autonomy and freedom. Consent is a fundamental principle of democratic governance, ensuring that individuals have a say in the decisions that affect their lives. By prioritizing informed consent, societies can promote accountability and respect for personal rights, thereby legitimizing authority through the collective agreement of the governed. Ultimately, Beverage emphasizes that a just society must balance authority with the respect for individual agency.


Rendering care to a patient without consent could result in a charge of?

Battery


Can the IRS charge your credit card without your consent?

I dont belive so.


What are the potential legal consequences of taking pictures without consent and what is the charge for doing so?

Taking pictures without consent can potentially lead to legal consequences such as invasion of privacy, harassment, or even stalking charges. The specific charge for taking pictures without consent can vary depending on the circumstances and the laws of the jurisdiction, but it is generally considered a violation of privacy rights.


How does beveridge answer te charge that governing people without their consent is wrong?

He says that some people are not capable of self-government and pointed out that the United States already does it with Native Americans.