0
The embryonic stage for many animals is very similar. For example, fish, bird, rabbit, and human embryos are similar in appearance in the early stages. They all have gill slits, a two-chambered heart, and a tail with muscles to move it. Later on, as the embryos grow and develop, they become less and less similar.
I don't claim expertise in evolutionary theory, but it seems so persuasive that I am willing to accept it as the best concept yet.
I've heard a Creationist say. "Well. there's no example of an animal that is half cat and half dog"
But that just shows that he has no concept of evolutionary theory
What else can I help you with?
What is one line of evidence supporting evolution that scientists learned after Darwin's book was published?
The discovery of DNA and the ability to study genetic sequences have provided strong evidence supporting evolution by showing similarities in DNA among different species, indicating a common ancestry. This molecular evidence was not available to Darwin and has since reinforced the theory of evolution.
There is evidence that homo erectus lived in china?
Yes, fossil evidence indicates that Homo erectus inhabited China over 1.6 million years ago. Discoveries like the Zhoukoudian site in Beijing have provided valuable insights into the early presence and evolution of Homo erectus in the region. These findings contribute to our understanding of human migration and evolution.
What is one new line of evidence supporting evolution that scienists learned after Darwin's book was published?
One new line of evidence supporting evolution that scientists learned after Darwin's book was published is the discovery of DNA and the understanding of how genetic information is passed down from one generation to the next. DNA sequencing has provided clear evidence of the relatedness of different species and how they have evolved over time.
What are the evidence of evolution for DNA?
DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) is the genetic material because it contains the code for the entire organism. It's sort like an equation from which an entire organism with all it's unique differences can be created.
Why was Darwin's theory of evolution better than other theories of evolution?
Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection was better than other theories of his time because it provided a mechanism (natural selection) to explain how evolution occurs. It was supported by evidence from various scientific disciplines such as geology, paleontology, and morphology. Additionally, Darwin's theory was able to explain the diversity of life on Earth in a simple and elegant way.
Why was Darwin's theory of evolution accepted?
Darwin's theory of evolution was accepted because it provided a coherent explanation for the diversity of life on Earth. His observations and evidence of natural selection as the mechanism driving evolution were supported by fossil records and comparative anatomy. The theory also offered a unifying framework that could explain the adaptation of species to their environment.
Was Darwin's theory of evolution correct?
Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection has been widely accepted in the scientific community and has provided a robust framework for understanding the diversity of life on Earth. Over time, new evidence in genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy has continued to support and refine the principles of evolutionary theory.
Evidence supporting the theory of evolution is provided by the field of what?
for all using Plato the answer is G) all of the above.
What is one line of evidence supporting evolution that scientists learned after Darwin's book was published?
The discovery of DNA and the ability to study genetic sequences have provided strong evidence supporting evolution by showing similarities in DNA among different species, indicating a common ancestry. This molecular evidence was not available to Darwin and has since reinforced the theory of evolution.
Is Charles Darwin contradict the theory of evolution?
No, Charles Darwin did not contradict the theory of evolution. In fact, he is considered one of the founders of the theory with his work on natural selection. Darwin's research provided evidence and a framework for understanding how species change over time through the process of evolution.
What are the six scientific advances since Darwins death that have provided support for the theory of evolution?
There is nothing newly or old that support Darwin's evolution theory.Some of scientists reject Darwin's Theory of evolution and some of them don't. t I personally support it fairly due to my own beliefs and other scientist reject it for their on. Don't think that what you read in the Internet is always correct. The edge of science will always be on debate. Let me note that Darwin lived in another era and the ability of explaining natural laws was not even close than the way we can explain it today. So for me he earned my respected.
Natural selection provided mechanism for?
Evolution.
Evidence supporting the theory of evolution is provided by the field of?
The field of genetics provides strong evidence supporting the theory of evolution. Genetic studies show how organisms accumulate and pass on changes in their DNA over generations, illustrating the process of natural selection and genetic variation that drives evolution. Comparing the genetic code of different species can also reveal shared ancestry and evolutionary relationships.
There is evidence that homo erectus lived in china?
Yes, fossil evidence indicates that Homo erectus inhabited China over 1.6 million years ago. Discoveries like the Zhoukoudian site in Beijing have provided valuable insights into the early presence and evolution of Homo erectus in the region. These findings contribute to our understanding of human migration and evolution.
Who provided Charles Darwin with info about evolution?
no one "provided" him, it was based on his discovery and science
Is Darwin's Theory of Evolution true?
There is plenty of fossil records and observable speciation to provide evidence for Evolution. Within the scientific community there is little to no debate on whether evolution is wrong. No concrete evidence has been provided by anyone to dispute the claims of evolution since its formulation by Darwin, otherwise it would have been discarded through the scientific method.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------While the above is right, observation and scientific studies provide evidence and arguments to the theory.
How can DNA and proteins provided evidence and evolution?
We can look at DNA to see that all organisms are related, just like people can take a DNA test to see whether they are related to a particlar person.
