0
How does disagreement between scientists affect scientific knowledge?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Yep, this is a common sentiment. I feel specific methods and other variables contribute. Not being a researcher myself, I probably can't answer this properly, but as a science student I can say that it is actually VERY easy for the results of a situation to be interpreted differently by two groups with the tweaking of one tiny factor *shrugs*
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoScientists agree that evolution occurs. Scientists agree that evolution has lead life through a tree of shared ancestry to our current biological diversity. Scientists agree largely on the various processes, principles and mechanisms that shape evolution. But like with everything, the devil's in the details. What were some of those common ancestors like? What conditions drove them to adapt the way they did? From the molecular level to the morphological, there are still plenty of questions left to be answered. And the answers to those questions are the ones still debated by scientists.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoYou may want to be more specific about your question.
Some scientists trust some methods more than others, based on how much they trust the experimental method, or the precision and accuracy of the instruments/materials they use, or sometimes just based on their familiarity with said subfield.
For example, a lot of scientists may discount astronomy and astrophysics because the fields are routinely associated with high accepted errors (up to 30% for some calcuations).
Typically, the softer sciences, like geology, psychology, etc... have less quantitative results with a less firm basis. It is not uncommon for scientists to disagree with the meaning of a result that might have several likely causes.
This is a part of science and is usually helpful. Before someone publishes something, experts in that field will scrutinize the work and make sure their evidence holds up and is reproducable, where available.
Like I said, you should be more specific so more specific examples can be given in the explanation.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoit moves scientific knowledge forward
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoIt moves Scientific knoledge forward
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How does disagreement between scientist affect scientist knowledge?
it moves scientific knowledge forward
Difference between scientific knowledge and other kinds of knowledge?
the differnce is .... you should go in your book and see cuz i dont have the answer
What is the difference between an artist and a scientist?
In brief: Artists usually do not try to explain the reasons of anything, they try to show aspects of existence (of whatever). But they always use scientific knowledge to perform their art. Scientists, in contrary, try to collect knowledge about existence and it's consequences, and they try to understand and explain the reasons. (Which, by the way, can afford artistic skills, in some cases.) Both of the above does not exclude the existence of scientists with artistic skills, or artists with a scientific attitude, although I cant give an example for any of those at the moment.
What is a public disagreement between groups with different views is called?
Epistemological debate.
What is difference between argument and option?
an argument is a disagreement between two people while an option is a preffered choice or point of view.
How does disagreement between scientist affect scientist knowledge?
it moves scientific knowledge forward
What is the relationship between a scientific investigatin and a scientific knowledge?
the relationship between a scientific investigation and a scientific knowledge is that they lead to constantly changing.
Who were the two men who made the scientific method?
No two men invented the scientific method. The scientific method is a subjective concept that differs between scientists and institutions.
Difference between scientific knowledge and other kinds of knowledge?
the differnce is .... you should go in your book and see cuz i dont have the answer
What is an important similarity between the way scientists were thinking during the scientific revolution and the way philosophers were thinking during the enlightenment?
Both scientists during the scientific revolution and philosophers during the Enlightenment were focused on using reason and empirical evidence to understand the world around them. They both emphasized the importance of critical thinking, questioning traditional beliefs, and advocating for progress through knowledge and reason.
Comparison between the filipino and foreign scientist contribution in the field of science?
There are many Filipino and other international scientists that have contributed valuable knowledge to the scientific community. Some Filipino scientists include Eduardo San Juan, Roberto del Rosario, and Daniel Dingel. Other international scientists include Albert Einstein, Jean Dausset, and Maurice Dongier.
What are the different between a scientists law and scientific theory?
law is based on fact theory is a concept/idea
Why is it important that a name for a species is published in a scientific journal?
It informs other scientists of its existence, and makes it easier for other scientists to find the relationships between animals
What is the difference between Islam and Science?
There is no inherent difference between Islam and science. During the European Dark Ages it was Islam that preserved ancient Greek and Roman knowledge that became lost in the Christian world. And during the Middle Ages, Islam led the Christian world in scientific advances. There is no reason that future Muslim scientists need not be at the forefront of scientific investigation.
What is the difference between an artist and a scientist?
In brief: Artists usually do not try to explain the reasons of anything, they try to show aspects of existence (of whatever). But they always use scientific knowledge to perform their art. Scientists, in contrary, try to collect knowledge about existence and it's consequences, and they try to understand and explain the reasons. (Which, by the way, can afford artistic skills, in some cases.) Both of the above does not exclude the existence of scientists with artistic skills, or artists with a scientific attitude, although I cant give an example for any of those at the moment.
How were Scientists of the Scientific Revolution and philosophers in the Age of Enlightenment linked?
Scientists of the Scientific Revolution and philosophers of the Age of Enlightenment were linked through their shared emphasis on reason, observation, and the pursuit of knowledge. Many Enlightenment thinkers were inspired by the scientific discoveries and methods of the earlier period, leading to a greater emphasis on rationality and empirical evidence in philosophy and society. This connection between science and philosophy helped shape the intellectual culture of the time and influenced developments in both fields.
What components of a scientific investigation would benefit from communication between scientists?
Communication between scientists is crucial in all components of a scientific investigation. It helps to share and refine research ideas, collaborate on experimental design and data interpretation, provide feedback on methodology and results, and ensure the overall credibility and reproducibility of the study. Strong communication among scientists can lead to more robust and impactful scientific discoveries.
