A law can be proven without any doubt.
A theory hasn't been disproven yet.
Basically, a theory is when there have been no instances that prove it wrong, but it can't be 100% proved correctly. For example the effect of wormholes are theory only, they can't be proved completely, but they can't be disproved.
A law is known without a doubt. For example, on earth gravity causes things to fall toward the center of the earth- a known fact
Theories can be wrong, but laws have been proven to be correct.
A theory is just an idea of how things work a law is a theory already proven that applies anywhere just depending of the variables used in the law
Because they differ
A scintific law is a statement that describes what scientisis expect to happen. A scintififc theory is a well-tested explantion for a range of observations. This answers the question '' How Does Scientific Law Differ From Scientific Theroy?''
It refers to the legal rules and regulations in a particular locality. Which often differ
because i a theory is someones idea of what happend, that is debaitable with many diffrent ideas. but a scientific law is what is it.
he was wrong
command of sovereign sanctioned by punishments is law by imperative theory and law as legal science of norms is by pure theory of law.
The theory come first because without a theory there is nothing to make a law.
A scientific law is a statement that describes what scientists expect to happen every time under a particular set of conditions. Unlike a theory, a scientific law describes an observed pattern without attempting to explain it.
how does a theory differ from an inference
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
Pure Theory of Law was created in 1934.