No, it is not.
inertia just depends on mass. Big mass=hard to move.
Inertia is an extensive property of a substance proportional to its mass, and therefore depends on the amount of the sample.
That's because inertia does not depend on weight. An object's mass causes two effects: One is the gravitational interaction (force) with other masses. This is proportional to both masses (also, the force decreases with distance). The other is inertia - if an object has mass, then it requires an effort to change its velocity. Inertia depends on the mass - NOT on the weight. Weight also depends on the mass. However, weight also depends on the mass of other objects - for example, on Earth, our weight depends on the gravitational field of planet Earth.
inertia is the laziness of an object, or an objects resistance to change its state of motion, or how easy it is to start or stop an object. Mass is the measure of an object's inertia. Therefore with more mass, an object has more inertia.
Inertia depends on mass.
No it depends on mass.
amount of inertia of body depends upon mass of that body
inertia simply depends upon mass.
It depends on the object's mass.
Mass & speed.
Primarily mass.
A baseball rolling along the floor has inertia. The amount of inertia depends on the mass of the object. The greater the mass or weight, the greater the inertia.
No, it is not.
inertia just depends on mass. Big mass=hard to move.
Inertia is an extensive property of a substance proportional to its mass, and therefore depends on the amount of the sample.
The ratio is the same. Inertia depends entirely on mass.