PERC dry cleaning produces percholorethylene, PCE, tetrachloroethylene, and tetrachloroethene which has been identified as a toxic contaminant and potential human carcinogen. CO2 does not produce these chemicals it is cleaner and greener.
CO2 dry cleaning is more environmentally friendly than traditional dry cleaning methods because it does not use harmful chemicals. It is also more effective at removing stains and odors from clothing.
One of the chemicals that is used in dry cleaning is called Trachloroethylene, also known as perchloroethylene (or "perk"). Most dry cleaners used it because it gets rid of stains from delicate materials. about 85% of dry cleaners now use perc. also.......... Glycol ethers (dipropylene glycol tertiary-butyl ether) (Rynex)(Solvair) --- In many cases more effective than perchloroethylene (perc) and in all cases more environmentally friendly. Dipropylene glycol tertiary butyl ether (DPTB) has a flashpoint far above current industry standards, yet at the same time possesses a degree of solvency for water-soluble stains that is at least equivalent to, and in most cases better than, perc and the other glycol ether dry cleaning solvents presently in commercial use. A particular advantage of the DPTB-water solutions of the Rynex product in dry cleaning is that they do not behave like a typical mixture, but, rather, the behavior is the same as a single substance. This permits a better-defined separation upon azeotropic distillation at a lower boiling point and also facilitates reclamation more effectively, at a level of 99% or greater, and also enhances purification using conventional distillation techniques.[4] Hydrocarbon --- This is most like standard dry cleaning, but the processes use hydrocarbon solvents such as Exxon-Mobil's DF-2000 or Chevron Phillips' EcoSolv. These petroleum-based solvents are less aggressive than perc and require a longer cleaning cycle. While flammable, these solvents do not present a high risk of fire or explosion when used properly. Hydrocarbon also contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that contribute to smog.[5] Liquid silicone (decamethylcyclopentasiloxane or D5) --- gentler on garments than Perc and does not cause color loss. Requires a license be obtained to utilize the property of GreenEarth Cleaning. Degrades within days in the environment to silica and trace amounts of water and CO2. Produces nontoxic, nonhazardous waste. Toxicity tests by Dow Corning shows the solvent to increase the incidence of tumors in female rats (no effects were seen in male rats), but further research concluded that the effects observed in rats are not relevant to humans because the biological pathway that results in tumor formation is unique to rats.[6](170.6 °F/77 °C flash point). Modified hydrocarbon blends (Pure Dry) Perchloroethylene --- In use since the 1940s, perc is the most common solvent, the "standard" for cleaning performance, and most aggressive cleaner. It can cause color bleeding/loss, especially at higher temperatures, and may destroy special trims, buttons, and beads on some garments. Better for oil-based stains (which account for about 10% of stains) than more common water-soluble stains (coffee, wine, blood, etc). Known for leaving a characteristic chemical smell on garments. Nonflammable. Liquid CO2 --- Consumer Reports rated this method superior to conventional methods, but the Drycleaning and Laundry Institute commented on its "fairly low cleaning ability" in a 2007 report.[7] Another industry certification group, America's Best Cleaners, counts CO2 cleaners among its members. Machinery is expensive---up to $90,000 more than a perc machine, making affordability difficult for small businesses. Some cleaners with these machines keep traditional machines on-site for the heavier soiled textiles, but others find plant enzymes to be equally effective and more environmentally sustainable. CO2-cleaned clothing does not off-gas volatile compounds. CO2 cleaning is also used for fire- and water-damage restoration due to its effectiveness in removing toxic residues, soot and associated odors of fire. Wet cleaning --- A system that uses water and biodegradable soap. Computer-controlled dryers and stretching machines ensure that the fabric retains its natural size and shape. Wet cleaning is claimed to clean a majority of "dry clean only" garments safely, including leather, suede, most tailored woolens, silk, and rayon. (Neckties seem to be the one exception.) Most perc cleaners use wet cleaning on some garments, but there are only about 20 exclusive wetcleaners in the U.S.
Dry cleaning using CO2 technology is more environmentally friendly than traditional methods because it does not use harmful chemicals. It also provides gentler care for garments, reducing the risk of damage or fading.
Dry cleaning with CO2 offers several benefits compared to traditional dry cleaning methods. It is more environmentally friendly as it does not use harsh chemicals, it is gentler on fabrics, and it is more effective at removing stains. Additionally, CO2 dry cleaning does not produce hazardous waste or air pollution, making it a safer and more sustainable option.
Liquid CO2 dry cleaning differs from traditional dry cleaning methods in that it uses carbon dioxide in liquid form as the cleaning solvent instead of harsh chemicals like perchloroethylene. This method is considered more environmentally friendly and gentler on fabrics, as well as being more energy efficient. Additionally, liquid CO2 dry cleaning does not produce hazardous waste or air pollution, making it a more sustainable option.
CO2 dry cleaning is more environmentally friendly than traditional dry cleaning methods because it does not use harmful chemicals. It is also more effective at removing stains and odors from clothing.
No their about the same
One of the chemicals that is used in dry cleaning is called Trachloroethylene, also known as perchloroethylene (or "perk"). Most dry cleaners used it because it gets rid of stains from delicate materials. about 85% of dry cleaners now use perc. also.......... Glycol ethers (dipropylene glycol tertiary-butyl ether) (Rynex)(Solvair) --- In many cases more effective than perchloroethylene (perc) and in all cases more environmentally friendly. Dipropylene glycol tertiary butyl ether (DPTB) has a flashpoint far above current industry standards, yet at the same time possesses a degree of solvency for water-soluble stains that is at least equivalent to, and in most cases better than, perc and the other glycol ether dry cleaning solvents presently in commercial use. A particular advantage of the DPTB-water solutions of the Rynex product in dry cleaning is that they do not behave like a typical mixture, but, rather, the behavior is the same as a single substance. This permits a better-defined separation upon azeotropic distillation at a lower boiling point and also facilitates reclamation more effectively, at a level of 99% or greater, and also enhances purification using conventional distillation techniques.[4] Hydrocarbon --- This is most like standard dry cleaning, but the processes use hydrocarbon solvents such as Exxon-Mobil's DF-2000 or Chevron Phillips' EcoSolv. These petroleum-based solvents are less aggressive than perc and require a longer cleaning cycle. While flammable, these solvents do not present a high risk of fire or explosion when used properly. Hydrocarbon also contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that contribute to smog.[5] Liquid silicone (decamethylcyclopentasiloxane or D5) --- gentler on garments than Perc and does not cause color loss. Requires a license be obtained to utilize the property of GreenEarth Cleaning. Degrades within days in the environment to silica and trace amounts of water and CO2. Produces nontoxic, nonhazardous waste. Toxicity tests by Dow Corning shows the solvent to increase the incidence of tumors in female rats (no effects were seen in male rats), but further research concluded that the effects observed in rats are not relevant to humans because the biological pathway that results in tumor formation is unique to rats.[6](170.6 °F/77 °C flash point). Modified hydrocarbon blends (Pure Dry) Perchloroethylene --- In use since the 1940s, perc is the most common solvent, the "standard" for cleaning performance, and most aggressive cleaner. It can cause color bleeding/loss, especially at higher temperatures, and may destroy special trims, buttons, and beads on some garments. Better for oil-based stains (which account for about 10% of stains) than more common water-soluble stains (coffee, wine, blood, etc). Known for leaving a characteristic chemical smell on garments. Nonflammable. Liquid CO2 --- Consumer Reports rated this method superior to conventional methods, but the Drycleaning and Laundry Institute commented on its "fairly low cleaning ability" in a 2007 report.[7] Another industry certification group, America's Best Cleaners, counts CO2 cleaners among its members. Machinery is expensive---up to $90,000 more than a perc machine, making affordability difficult for small businesses. Some cleaners with these machines keep traditional machines on-site for the heavier soiled textiles, but others find plant enzymes to be equally effective and more environmentally sustainable. CO2-cleaned clothing does not off-gas volatile compounds. CO2 cleaning is also used for fire- and water-damage restoration due to its effectiveness in removing toxic residues, soot and associated odors of fire. Wet cleaning --- A system that uses water and biodegradable soap. Computer-controlled dryers and stretching machines ensure that the fabric retains its natural size and shape. Wet cleaning is claimed to clean a majority of "dry clean only" garments safely, including leather, suede, most tailored woolens, silk, and rayon. (Neckties seem to be the one exception.) Most perc cleaners use wet cleaning on some garments, but there are only about 20 exclusive wetcleaners in the U.S.
Dry cleaning using CO2 technology is more environmentally friendly than traditional methods because it does not use harmful chemicals. It also provides gentler care for garments, reducing the risk of damage or fading.
Dry cleaning with CO2 offers several benefits compared to traditional dry cleaning methods. It is more environmentally friendly as it does not use harsh chemicals, it is gentler on fabrics, and it is more effective at removing stains. Additionally, CO2 dry cleaning does not produce hazardous waste or air pollution, making it a safer and more sustainable option.
No compressed air would be better for accuracy as well as your gun. Its like co2 but at a higher pressure with cleaner air and no liquid that can damage your paintball marker.
Liquid CO2 dry cleaning differs from traditional dry cleaning methods in that it uses carbon dioxide in liquid form as the cleaning solvent instead of harsh chemicals like perchloroethylene. This method is considered more environmentally friendly and gentler on fabrics, as well as being more energy efficient. Additionally, liquid CO2 dry cleaning does not produce hazardous waste or air pollution, making it a more sustainable option.
It depends on what type of gun you are using. Refer to the manual. I would say that Green gas would be better than CO2 because it keeps your gun in better condition, but use CO2 if your gun suggests that you should use HFC 134a.
The pressurized machines used to convert the CO2 into the liquid state are costly. Liquid Carbon dioxide isn't the strongest cleaning agent, even though it may be environmentally friendly.
I am not sure what you mean by "perc", however one CRITICAL thing that many "environmental advocates" forget is that Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is absolutely crucial to the environment: Plants need it in order to live and as a by-product they produce oxygen (which we, and other animals need to live). Its really easy to get carried away with all of the pressure to "reduce your carbon foot print" and other environmental efforts, to end up thinking that carbon dioxide itself is the problem, when this just isn't true. In fact, if you look through the geologic records, the period of time where earth had the greatest diversity and density of life was actually the mesozoic era, which was on average, 15-25 degrees warmer than the earth currently, and roughly 30% more CO2 in the environment.
No. even though some spring guns have great range, co2 allows you to fire more then once before reloading.
Hydrogen is a dangerous flammable gas and has never been used in paintball. You probably mean N2, which is compressed air (primarily nitrogen) Which is more efficient, less expensive and generally better (besides the container) then Co2.