Since there are no significant amounts of free hydrogen, it should be considered more of an energy storage than an energy source. In other words, it takes energy to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen; you get that energy back when the hydrogen is burned.
hydrogen
carbohydrates and lipids
Only if Fusion becomes a reality. Since "free" hydrogen is not available it must be "made" (separated from water, etc.). Thus it can "transport" energy, but it can't be a fuel (or energy) source.
well htey get there energy from burning the gasses that it is made of like our sun
Hydrocarbon is an organic compound which is entirely made up of hydrogen and carbon. Hydrocarbons are the main source of the world’s electric energy and heat because of the energy produced when they are burned.
the energy source for hydrogen is semen ;)
Hydrogen is an element and an energy source itself.
Hydrogen is a nonrenewable source of energy when used for nuclear fusion (which is still not a technologically attainable power generation mechanism). When used as an energy carrier for oxidation (e.g. fuel cell, and internal combustion engine) hydrogen is not an energy source. In such applications, hydrogen is a man-made resource.
the answer is yes because if the world ends then hydrogen is an energy source and in some places people are using it already
It isn't - there are no large deposits of hydrogen anywhere. Hydrogen can be used for energy STORAGE.
hydrogen fusion
Hydrogen is not a renewable fuel. It is a secondary energy source (or an energy carrier) that could be produced using another primary energy source. Hydrogen could be produced using either renewable primary energy source (e.g. solar energy), nuclear energy, or by using fossil fuel (e.g. natural gas)
The main source of energy of the sun is the fusion of hydrogen to helium.
Fusion Reaction of Hydrogen
cleanest energy source.
Fusion Reaction of Hydrogen
Hydrogen .