It's never been great but depends on chassis. I have to assume it's Ford unless you specify otherwise. In a ranger for example combined would be about 22 (or thereabouts depending on trans/driving habits). Many owners are criticized for not going to one extreme or the other, a 4 cylinder (for mileage) or a 4.0 for raw power. Personally I always found the 3.0 to be very good on power for everyday and the Vulcan bottom end has a rep for being bulletproof. I admit the 2.3 uses noticeably less gas but you have to get used to the lack of power-I wouldn't take an extended cab with one although they are out there. You will have to base your decision on how much you drive and or if you need a family car. If you drive little or need a large car-take the 3.0. Ford is dropping/has dropped the 3.0 on many newer vehicles-the later Rangers for example forcing the choice on consumers.
It depends.
It depends on the engine. On my 94 Grand am with 3.1 V6 I get about 19 miles to the gallon in town and 25 miles to the gallon on the high way. David
Depends on which engine it is equipped with.
about 12.5
A Mercury Mountaineer can get about 14 miles to each gallon. This is when traveling on interstate.
an economic 4 cilynder engine could give you a good 30 miles per gallon in the highway, where a high performance 8 cylinger engine could only give you 9 miles per gallon.
Depending on the engine size year model and weight of the vehicle miles per gallon can vary.
I am getting close to 10 - 11 miles to the gallon in a 1989 ford dually with a 460 fuel injected engine.
The miles per gallon that an El Camino gets depends on the size of the engine. An El Camino with a Chevy 350 gets about 22 miles per gallon.
Depends on engine, transmission, gearing, etc.
Assuming you're referring to miles per gallon, depends on the engine and model
The 1998 Ford Expedition SUV gets 12 miles per gallon in the city, and 16 miles per gallon on the highway. This vehicle is powered by an 8-cylinder engine.