First:
Comparing the electropotential values of both redox couples (being equal, see below 1. and 2.)
AND considering that Cl2 gas might escape the mixture giving toxic fumes,
it does NOT look a good titration method.
Second:
There is no exact answer possible because the titration end point can never be established, you'll never know when the last Cl2 is escaped, and there is no sharp (sudden) change in colour, and the reaction at the endpoint is very slow.
Third: The answer is 60.9 mL
The equivalent point (theorethical end point) can be calculated as follows:
mEq reductor (HCl) = mEq oxidator (K2Cr2O7)0.325 (mEq/mL HCl) * VHCl (mL) = 0.526 (mEq/mL K2Cr2O7) * 37.6 (mL K2Cr2O7)So VHCl (mL) = 0.526 (mEq/mL K2Cr2O7) * 37.6 (mL K2Cr2O7) / 0.325 (mEq/mL HCl) = 60.854 = 60.9 mL
The solute will eventually fall out of a supersaturated solution
It could be soap, shampoo, or any other substance that contains surfactants, which reduce the surface tension of water and create a slippery feeling.
Dichromatometry is a kind of titration used in analytical chemistry, where Potassium Dichromate (K2Cr2O7), a primary standard substance solution is used for estimation of mainly metal ions, like Fe+2 etc. As dichromate is used as the titrating substance, the name dichromatometry. Mainly BDS (Barium Diphenylamine Sulphonate) indicator is used in this kind of titration.
The purpose of hydroxylamine solution in iron analysis is to reduce Fe(III) to Fe(II). This conversion is necessary because the method typically used for quantifying iron measures Fe(II) specifically. The addition of hydroxylamine ensures accurate determination of the iron concentration in the sample.
increase the pH of the solution, making it more basic. This is because bases release hydroxide ions (OH-) when dissolved in water, which can react with H+ ions in the solution, thereby raising the pH.
Add a base or a buffer into the solution.
The solution to land pollution is the three Rs. Reduce, Reuse and Recycle.
mob
reduce software faikure rate and increase productivity
No, starch does not reduce Fehling's solution. Starch is a polysaccharide composed of glucose molecules linked together, whereas Fehling's solution is a complex of copper sulfate, sodium hydroxide, and potassium sodium tartrate used to test for the presence of reducing sugars. Starch is not a reducing sugar and therefore will not react with Fehling's solution.
The acid that reduces Fehling's solution is ascorbic acid (vitamin C). It causes the blue solution to turn into a brick-red precipitate of cuprous oxide.
Among the options listed, maltose, lactose, and fructose can reduce Fehling's solution due to the presence of a free aldehyde or ketone group. Sucrose, on the other hand, is a non-reducing sugar because its glycosidic bond prevents it from exhibiting reducing properties. Therefore, the sugars that can reduce Fehling's solution are maltose, lactose, and fructose.
increase the usage of solar energy and reduce the usage of gas...
noise insullation in walls help to reduce the noise and also triple glazing
row reduce the matrix in question and see if it has any free variables. if it does then it has many solution's. If not then it only has one unique solution. which is of course the trivial solution (0)
noise insullation in walls help to reduce the noise and also triple glazing
Use a solution of 1 part vinegar and 2 parts water.