Not always, the unbalanced force only points in the direction of the acceleration so a body may be moving in the opposite direction.
Example.
A car moves with some speed to the right on a horizontal surface and lock the brakes, if the surface has friction, but the net force acting on it is equal to the frictional force pointing left and produces a Deceleration of carriage until stop, but while this happens continuously in motion to the right.
They accelerate in the direction of the unbalanced force. If they were already moving, there will be an increasing velocity component in the direction of the unbalanced force.
No. It will ACCELERATE in that direction, which is not the same as MOVING in that direction. As an example, an object moving at constant speed in a circle, will accelerate towards the center.
Friction acts in the opposite direction of the object's motion
False
Does spinning water always spin in the same direction?
No, acceleration is change in velocity. (And velocity is speed in a certain direction.) If an object slows down, then it is changing velocity and thus accelerating. (In this case, the acceleration is negative.) If an object changes direction, then it's velocity changes, so this is also acceleration. (This is centripetal acceleration.)
Once an object, any object, such as the Earth, is set in motion to rotate in a particular direction, it will always continue to rotate in that direction. For the Earth to rotate in another direction would take an enormous, cataclysmic force that would have to be created by a gigantic object colliding with it, or at least coming very close to it.
Yes. If there is an unbalanced force on an object, the object will always accelerate in the direction of the force.
Friction acts in the opposite direction of the object's motion
No this causes an unbalanced force or a balanced forceNO chizz you rape the poor person!
When the forces are balanced, there is no acceleration (Ex: Anything stationary or anything with uniform motion). Unbalanced forces ALWAYS cause acceleration.
because it always opposes the direction of the applied force.
There's no such thing as "an unbalanced force". But when the entire group of forceson an object is unbalanced, then the object must accelerate.
He was always a bit strange and many said he was unbalanced. There was no way it would stand for long as looking at it you could clearly see that it was unbalanced.
If I am reading your question correctly, you want to now if balanced forces can change the direction an object is traveling. The answer is no. Balanced forces always produce no net change, hence the term "balanced". You need an unbalanced force to change the direction of an object, or to set an object in motion from a standstill.
An unbalanced force will always make an object accelerate. If the object is at rest, it will start moving.
There's no such thing as "an unbalanced force".When the group of forces acting on an object is unbalanced, then the objectaccelerates, in the direction of the vector sum of the forces.
false
more motion :O