0
augutus
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Where all of the emperors of Ancient Rome bad?
Yes.
What did the ancient Romans believe came after death for emporers?
The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.
When was the period of bad emperors?
There was no period of bad emperors as such. The term "five good emperors" is a historical tag given to the five emperors from Nerva to Marcus Aurelius because there was no great political crises during their reigns and the empire ran smoothly. A far as "bad emperors" went, you could say that every emperor had his negative points even Augustus -- some more than others.
How did emperors Caligula and Nero differ from their predecessor Agustus?
IN a book titled IMPACT, it states that Agustus was a good emperor while Caligula and Nero were bad emperors and weak.
Was commodus a good or bad emperor?
There were five good emperors (a term which was coined by Machiavelli and is still used). They were: Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius. Although Commodus was Marcus Aurelius' son and chosen heir, he is not considered one of the good emperors. He had little interest in state administration and delegated the running of the state to his favourites. He preferred to live outside Rome, spending his time hunting. His bad rule led to several conspiracies, his assassination and the so-called Year of the Five Emperors. In this year five men fought each other to become emperors. Four of them were deposed soon after usurping the tile. The last one, Septimius Severus, managed to hold on to power. Commodus' rule was described by an ancient historian as the descent "from a kingdom of gold to one of rust and iron."
Who were the bad emperors of rome?
Nero and Vespasian
Where all of the emperors of Ancient Rome bad?
Yes.
What historical event is associated with the fall of rome?
The bad emperors
Who was the emperor Caligula of Rome?
Caligula was an emperor of Rome. he was one of the bad emperors and just really treated people bad and wanted to torture them.
What were the good and bad things about ancient Rome?
The Good and Bad things about ancient rome are:GoodFreshwater supplyGreat ArchitectureLawsEducationSewers (Technology)Bad SlaveryConstant warsUrine tax
What did the ancient Romans believe came after death for emporers?
The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.The Romans believed that either damnation or deification came after death for their emperors. The bad ones, they "dammed their memory" and erased their names from the rolls of emperors. The good ones were deified and were considered gods.
When was the period of bad emperors?
There was no period of bad emperors as such. The term "five good emperors" is a historical tag given to the five emperors from Nerva to Marcus Aurelius because there was no great political crises during their reigns and the empire ran smoothly. A far as "bad emperors" went, you could say that every emperor had his negative points even Augustus -- some more than others.
Why are the Julian emperors often referred to as the Bad Emperors?
Ever time they were emperors, something bad happend.(ex. war)
How did emperors Caligula and Nero differ from their predecessor Agustus?
IN a book titled IMPACT, it states that Agustus was a good emperor while Caligula and Nero were bad emperors and weak.
Was commodus a good or bad emperor?
There were five good emperors (a term which was coined by Machiavelli and is still used). They were: Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius. Although Commodus was Marcus Aurelius' son and chosen heir, he is not considered one of the good emperors. He had little interest in state administration and delegated the running of the state to his favourites. He preferred to live outside Rome, spending his time hunting. His bad rule led to several conspiracies, his assassination and the so-called Year of the Five Emperors. In this year five men fought each other to become emperors. Four of them were deposed soon after usurping the tile. The last one, Septimius Severus, managed to hold on to power. Commodus' rule was described by an ancient historian as the descent "from a kingdom of gold to one of rust and iron."
Was the roman empire a good or bad thing?
_Bad_Good"> Bad Good1.Caligula (37-41) 1.Nevra (96-98)2.Elagabalus (218-224) 2.Trajan (98-117)3.Commodus (180-192) 3.Hadrian (117-138)4.Nero (54-68) 4.Antoninus Pius (138-161)5.Domitian (81-96) 5.Marcus Aurelius (161-180)
Why were the emperors after Augustus cruel and bad leaders?
They were not cruel and not necessarily bad leaders. Augustus's successor was a reluctant emperor and did not like to get involved in politics. Caligula was the only one who had a reputation for being cruel and this was caused by mental illness. Claudius did many good things for Rome and the empire Nero was eccentric and was subjected to a lot of slander. However, he was not a bad ruler and was loved by the poor.
