answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The hurricane itself was a natural disaster. It is impossible to attribute a single storm to climate change, although there are studies that indicate that it may have been stronger and better organized than it otherwise would have (if the Gulf weren't as warm). Regardless, New Orleans is situated in an area at high risk of hurricanes no matter how the climate changes. However, the disaster that Katrina caused was indisputably influenced by humans, i.e., the way New Orleans is built (it is now below sea level with a lake on one side) and the way the levees were constructed. The way the disaster played out magnified certain inequities in society that are purely human policy-generated and have nothing to do with the environment. So depending on exactly what you're referring to, Katrina was almost entirely a natural disaster, or it was very much human-induced, in terms of what unfolded after the hurricane had already done its damage.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

The hurricane itself WA natural, nothing could have prevented it. Flood defenses were deficient, which made the damage worse than it might have been. The authiorities responded slowly (?) which added to human suffering.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Hurricane Katrina was a natural event as is any hurricane..

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

its a natural disaster because when a natural phenomenon come were we live it becomes a natural disaster

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How was hurricane karina a natural disaster?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp