like the system of fuedalism, the Church had its own orgnization. Power was based on status. Church sturucture was based on different ranks of clergy.
was the concordat of worms a fair compromise for both the emperor and the church? Why or Why not?
In Europe's Feudal System, peasants were the lowest class and were treated like slaves.
Nobody knows who made the feudal system. But it goes like this: king barons knights peaseants
It had a feudal system of its own
After the Battle of Hastings, the English put up with it for a long time. But, they didn't like it so they rebelled against called the Peasants Revolt, and brought down the feudal system.
a noble was part of a feudal system, Nobles was a higher rank in the fedual system.
Lay investiture is (was) the appointment of bishops and other church officials by non-church authorities, like the feudal lord. the appointment of church officials by kings and nobles rather than by the pope
The manor system protects serfs and merchants like that that live in manors lords protect the serfs and merchants by permitting them to live in the manors in return for their military services. While the feudal system was a way to keep the different classes like Middle Class in order with kings on top and serfs on bottom. They were alike because the serfs and merchants needed to be protected in the manor system and the serfs and merchants were ordered according to the groups by superiority in the feudal system.
Feudem is a Latin word meaning to give land in return for services. As king, William owned all the land in England. But he could not manage it on his own, and he wanted to reward those supporters who had helped him beat Harold in the Battle of Hastings. So he shared the land with his loyal followers. William lent large estates of land to powerful barons. They gave smaller areas of this land, called manors, to knights. Knights were fighting men with little knowledge of farming. So they shared their manors among peasants, or villeins, who worked on it. Lending land in this way was called the feudal system. In the system, each person made promises in return for their land. The feudal system was totally new, however before 1066 their was an organising like the feudal system. But unlike the feudal system the people did not have to make promises for their land, they had to pay money for their land. As in both systems there was ranking of the people and the king was at the top and then to follow was the church. In the system before 1066 the rankings were in the following order The king and the Church , the earls, the thegns, the ceorls, the cottars and the serfs. After 1066 in the feudal system the ranking were in the following order The king and the Church, the barons, the knights, the villeins
The synapse is most like a joint.
The external sac-like structure of the male reproductive system is called the testes which reside in the scrotum.
Judaism doesn't have sacraments and there is no Church in Judaism. Both sacraments and church are strictly Christian entities.
it probably comes from the "feudal system" which basically goes like this: the king serves god,barons serve the king,knights serve the barons,pheasants serve the knights ect ect ect
It switched from the hacienda system, which worked almost like a feudal system, to that of community-owned lands, known as ejidos.
After the decline of the feudal system, centralized monarchical states gained power. France under Henry of Navarre and Louis XIV, Austria under the Hapsburgs, Spain under the Phillips and, to a certain extent, Britain under the Tudors and Stuarts. Though it retained a very feudal-like system, Russia was also to gain immense power very soon after the period in question.
A:The medieval popes regarded themselves as the highest power in Europe. Depending on circumstances, they claimed to be the temporal equal of the Holy Roman Emperor, but at other times, greater than the emperor or beholden to him. The pope was generally the wealthiest man in Europe and many of the medieval and Rennaisance popes like to live a lifestyle that reflected this.The cardinals were the next rank in the Church hierarchy and considered themselves 'princes of the Church', once again living in extravagent luxury, like princes or petty kings.If we wish to compare the Catholic Church hierarchy to the hierarchy of the secular feudal system, then the bishops and abbots certainly fitted in as the equivalent of the feudal lords. They often held huge landholdings, just like ordinary barons, and demanded subservience from all around them.Priests and monks could perhaps be compared to the knights of old. In fact, some of them were warrior priests, especially during and after the Crusades.
The brain shaped like a ball then the spine is shaped like a stick then you have all of the nerves. Because structure is how it is shaped.
the middle colonies were called for a congregationalist(which is a church government) structure, each individual church would be largely self-governing
Almost like a serf or servant, but a little better. They take care of farm fields and grow plants for their lord in the feudal system. The peasants are the 2nd to last on this system.
A waxy coat called ( cuticle)
answer The supreme leader in feudal Japan were the Shogun, they were like a type of military dictator.
The feudal system started after the Dark Ages, which was after the Fall of the Roman Empire. The Dark Ages was a time when there was no law and order and Europe was thrown into complete chaos. The feudal system came from this. A leader called Charmelagne first introduced this system in the eighth century (700's) to France, because he wanted help to control large areas of land and people. William the Conqueror then introduced this system to England after the he won the Battle of Hastings (1066). Suddenly, all of Europe was under the Feudal System.The Fuedal system can be best shown in a Hierarchy:1: The King. Very powerful and had most money. But would not do anything without first delegating with Church in hope of stopping rebellions.2: The Church. The Pope was the head of the Church and was almost as important as the king. People would go to war even if the Pope told them too. Gave advice to the King.3: Nobility. Lords and Bishops provided the king with money and advice. Would provide knights for wars and so on.4: Knights and Lesser Clergy (people in the church like monks & nuns.) Knights would fight in wars for the King. The monks and nuns would help people of the community.5: Peasants. They worked for the knights land or lords land as well as their own to pay tax. Had no rights and barely had enough to live. Were not educated so did not know how to read.
It's like a class system, such as the caste system in India or the feudal system in medieval Europe. The main purpose is conflict resolution Social hierarchy is levels of leadership. Like in wolves. Alpha is the highest chain of command, then beta, and so on and so on.
because there are more peasants than any kings, knights or lords. kings are the least populus.
The structure of the nreve cell is a complex system. That system is a long line of nerves that carry messages around our body. It looks like this..... FROM: STUDENT AT LOSOYA...Summer.G
The 'feudal system' is a political, economic and social system that was in place throughout much of medieval Europe. It includes factors like; Serfdom, cottage industry agriculture (small plots of land worked on by the poor/serfs), barons/local leaders who had a hereditary right to land they technically owned and the system of having a monarch (sometimes constitutional) to govern the country as a whole. Hope this helped.
Asked By Wiki User
Copyright © 2021 Multiply Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply.