You may put some burning fuel (as a piece of coal or some gasoline, etc..) under an airtight pot connected to vacuum system to suck air. You notice on sucking the air the diminishing of the burning until got completely off. Even if you don't such the air, the burning will get less and less due to the consumption of the limited Oxygen inside the pot.
Of course, burning any solid fuel generates air pollution.
Burning fossil fuel (and by the way try to carpool and Ride bike)
Our air quality would improve. Also, the amount of carbon dioxide in the air would be reduced.
The only mechanical component to hold down polution from fossil fuel burning cars is the catalitic converter.
When fuel is burnt, the carbon bonds with oxygen. If enough oxygen is available this will become carbon dioxide. In engines, less oxygen is available, and so burning the fuel is more likely to form carbon monoxide than in open air.
Oxygen
Its called "fire".
The burning of carbon - be it food in plants and animals or from burning fuel or from burning forests.
Wood is used for fuel through burning it in air (or Oxygen).
Mixes fuel and air at the desired ratio for burning.
smoke
No, Burning alcohol for fuel is not efficient. Not at all. It is horrible for the economy and pollutes the air. So false. E2020 questions... ugh!
Because they let out fume from the burning fuel.
Of course, burning any solid fuel generates air pollution.
There will be an accelerated greenhouse effect on the earth.
there should b presence of oxygen....
make the fuel sufficient burning