Statistically
The classical theory can prevent crime because it argues that crime which occurs due to forces of the world is aggravated by the absence of effective punishment, and therefore with effective punishment, criminals who are rational, will want to minimize pain, and maximize pleasure.
Government funds ARE used to prevent crime. Who else would fund it? Who do you think pays the salaries and funds your local,state, and federal law enforcement agencies?
not as many as the media would have you believe. there are more guns used to prevent crime from happening rather than guns used for crime.
arachnaphobia
Tithes didn't really stop crime, but it was a payment villagers in the middle ages would pay to the church, tithes were collected by the priest.
David Ricardo
no because it is more descriptive, so it would be an adjective.
It would prevent them from becoming a sworn law enforcement officer, but employment as a civilian technician, by either an agency or a private employer, might be possible.
david ricardo-appex
A Functionalist might view the Prohibition Era as an attempt to promote social order by reducing alcohol-related crime and improving public health. A Conflict Theorist might see it as a tool of social control by powerful groups to restrict the behavior of marginalized communities. An Interactionist might focus on how prohibition influenced social interactions, such as speakeasies providing spaces for people to socialize outside the law.
A classical Pentecostal church would be the Assembly of God Church.
A conflict theorist would view racism as a way for dominant groups to maintain power and control over marginalized groups. They would argue that racism creates social inequalities by allowing those in power to justify their privileged positions and oppress others based on race. Conflict theorists would advocate for dismantling systemic racism to address these power imbalances.