Guns are primarily used in war because you are able to kill a large number of people in a shorter period of time. Furthermore, they are rather easy to manufacture with relatively low costs so it is often used in war.
Yes, they did have machine guns in WW2
because their guns got dirty
Nothing was fired out of Quaker guns during the Civil War. Quaker guns were decoy guns made to make the enemy think a fortification or vessel had more cannon than it really had. Quaker guns were usually made of just a solid log of the right diameter.
Portugal supplied mail with guns.
whith war and guns
guns
Yes, they did have machine guns in WW2
1. Machine guns were not new; they had been used ten years earlier during the Russian-Japanese War (1904-1905). 2. Chemical warfare would be out-lawed in about 1925 by the Geneva convention, in time to affect WW2. 3. Tanks during WW1 would help to break the stalemate of trench warfare. They would evolve from their farming tractor beginnings into state of the art "AFV's" Armored Fighting Vehicles for WW2.
None. The Cold War was a "war" of nerves, words and political maneuvering. There were no guns involved (that's what made it a "cold" war).
North had better guns, but South had more rifles
they help by sending guns,food and other supplies to help the mens who were fighting the war.
Cause everything to help Britain (food arms guns) came from this port
Guns did not have safeties during the Civil War. However, some of the guns in the 1800s, had a half way spot between hammer down and hammer up that works kind of like a safety.
Guns
Yes, it was during the 1990s.
because their guns got dirty
Nothing was fired out of Quaker guns during the Civil War. Quaker guns were decoy guns made to make the enemy think a fortification or vessel had more cannon than it really had. Quaker guns were usually made of just a solid log of the right diameter.