Want this question answered?
I would say Manet's influence on her was greater than the other way around.
Berthe Morisot was born on January 14, 1841 and died on March 2, 1895. Berthe Morisot would have been 54 years old at the time of death or 174 years old today.
She was a true impressionist.
Two are definite Claude Monet and P-A Renoir. Edgar Degas is a famous member of the gang, but not strictly an impressionist. Alfred Sisley is, and so is Berthe Morisot. Camille Pissarro was for a time. Vincent Van Gogh would have to be included in the top 3.
Eau de toilette is a term that denotes both men's and women's perfume or cologne. The term is French and means "toilet water," but not in the way you would think. In this context, the term was meant to imply freshening up and personal grooming, for a lightly scented cologne or perfume was thought to be a skin refresher.
The original meaning of 'toilette' was not in fact toilet but something along the lines of freshen up. there fore the meaning of the eau de toilette is not toilet water as when the name was given it's direct translation would have been freshen up water.
"Many people can interpret things in a way that you didn't mean. (misinterpret)"A professional staff is assigned to interpret speeches at the UN. (translate)"Sigmund Freud was among early psychologists who taught patients to interpret their dreams."
Sadly no. Having said that, I would recommend many of their other delicious fragrances.
A "literalist" would interpret the Constitution just as it is written, rather than interpret its meaning in context.
You just did! Or you could say something like - She interpreted the question differently to her friends. Or - How would you interpret this text?
If you mean how would it interpret it, it would treat it as a piece of text. It would need an equals sign before it to make it into a formula and the result of the formula would be -2.If you mean how would it interpret it, it would treat it as a piece of text. It would need an equals sign before it to make it into a formula and the result of the formula would be -2.If you mean how would it interpret it, it would treat it as a piece of text. It would need an equals sign before it to make it into a formula and the result of the formula would be -2.If you mean how would it interpret it, it would treat it as a piece of text. It would need an equals sign before it to make it into a formula and the result of the formula would be -2.If you mean how would it interpret it, it would treat it as a piece of text. It would need an equals sign before it to make it into a formula and the result of the formula would be -2.If you mean how would it interpret it, it would treat it as a piece of text. It would need an equals sign before it to make it into a formula and the result of the formula would be -2.If you mean how would it interpret it, it would treat it as a piece of text. It would need an equals sign before it to make it into a formula and the result of the formula would be -2.If you mean how would it interpret it, it would treat it as a piece of text. It would need an equals sign before it to make it into a formula and the result of the formula would be -2.If you mean how would it interpret it, it would treat it as a piece of text. It would need an equals sign before it to make it into a formula and the result of the formula would be -2.If you mean how would it interpret it, it would treat it as a piece of text. It would need an equals sign before it to make it into a formula and the result of the formula would be -2.If you mean how would it interpret it, it would treat it as a piece of text. It would need an equals sign before it to make it into a formula and the result of the formula would be -2.
I believe that you would interpret this as a publication that is 'in print'.