If they were backing up, they would be going backwards...
If they were braking, they wouldn't be going anywhere......
Fault here would likely be shared. On the one hand, the driver backing really has no legal right to the lane they are backing into - you cannot cut someone off while you are backing up. But it seems you have described a situation in which the individual backing was well into the backing process when someone came along, from quite a distance, and hit them. Hence the driver in the lane already probably had the last clear chance to avoid the accident but chose not to and would hence bear the majority of the fault.
Likely a loose or broken strut or shock. Could be the same for a load leveling bar, depending on the vehicle.
It would be the person driving fault because it is like the same thing as driving and hitting someone.
no. its like would you rather owe someone 18 dollars or would you rather owe someone 10 dollars. so -10 is greater
86 percent would not date someone who smokes
i would assume its rather frowned upon...
I would say probably the person backing out, as they should of looked for any oncoming cars before backing out. ---- The person backing out of the driveway who did not yield to oncoming traffic.
Probably not. He said he would rather date someone smaller, so that he can cuddle her all the time.
braking your neck defiantly i would know I'm a doctor
you could either be your own boss or if you would rather work under someone else you could also do that to
You if you were backing up. If you were waiting at a stop sign or stoplight or even an entrance and someone else hit you, it would be the person behind's fault.
Were you backing up? Would need more specific details regarding the facts of loss to be of more assistance.