answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

This implies one has a standard to judge what is an act worthy of a human and what is not. Interestingly at the Nuremburg trials Goering said the Nazi actions in the Holocaust were not illegal and therefore not bad since they were following laws enacted by the German parliament. He stated that the trial was just the triumph of the victor over the vanquished. The chief prosecutor appealed to a 'higher standard' of right and wrong by which their actions could be condemned as 'crimes against humanity.' This the Nazis should have known yet ignored.

Every person has innately some sense of what it is to be human. This is why inhumane acts are seen as an aberration or departure from this. The Evolutionary theory in its starkness cannot explain this 'social conscience' but it does fit in with the Biblical view that man is made in God's image and so deserves dignity and respect. The fact that man regularly displays his fallen nature, and that this alienation from self can be noticed serves to highlight the reality of a higher ideal which we recognize as humanity.

  • but not all human acts are possible to do because of the gravity of the earth.
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Acts of man are acts that can be shared with other animals (sleeping, eating, walking, etc.), while Human acts are acts that are proper only to man (cursing, complementing, etc.).

To determine if an act is a human act, it should possess all three components: Knowledge (knowing what you're doing), Freedom (you chose to do it), and Voluntary (no one forced you to do it). If one component is missing, then the act is not a human act.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Human acts can also be called voluntary acts. These are actions done with full knowledge, full fredom of the will and full consent. While acts of man ae actios done with out the characteriste of the human acts such as heartbeat, death etc.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Acts of man are acts that can be shared with other animals. This includes acts such as sleeping and eating. Human acts, on the other hand, are acts that are proper only to man. Such acts include cursing, suicide, killing, and the like.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Humane acts are acts of mercy or acts that make you "Human". Acts of Human are not always nice, an example would be pollution.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Human acts are done out of the nature of being a human. Acts of man are purposeful and can be both good or bad.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Human acts are the actions of individuals. The acts of men describe socially complicit activities. Both of these can have influence on the other.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

The person is free to do it

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

nothing because they are the same.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Human acts vs acts of man?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the comparisons of act of man and human acts?

according to our Religion class, human acts are free acts that proceed from a deliberate will while the acts of man are involuntary acts that do not involve the use of intellect and will.


What is the different of human act of act of man?

Acts of man are acts that can be shared with other animals. This includes acts such as sleeping and eating. Human acts, on the other hand, are acts that are proper only to man. Such acts include cursing, suicide, killing, and the like.


What is different of human acts and acts of man?

Human acts are done with awareness, freedom and capacity of knowledge. However, act of man are behaviors arising without capacity for knowledge and freedom. It can be described as an accident


What does man vs man?

Man vs man is just a theme that indicates people are on the different sides of the conflict rather than Man versus nature, or the environment, or technology, or God, or man versus himself. It doesn't really have to be humans... you could have a man vs man theme if two aliens were facing off. If only one were human, you might have man vs alien, or man vs superman (anything with better than human powers).


What sense are human acts deliberate?

the sense are human acts deliberate is the actions with full of knowledge full of freedom of the full consent while acts of man actions.


What is acts man?

What a human does as opposed to what God does.


In what sense are human acts deliberate?

Human acts considered deliberate when the attributes were all present.


In what sense are human act?

the sense are human acts deliberate is the actions with full of knowledge full of freedom of the full consent while acts of man actions.


What is The difference of human acts and acts of human?

Humane acts are acts of mercy or acts that make you "Human". Acts of Human are not always nice, an example would be pollution.


What is the 5 primary forces?

man vs man, man vs self, man vs nature, man vs society, man vs fate. =D


Human acts in philosopy?

human acts?


What is the conflict in the story Inkheart-man vs nature man vs self or man vs man?

it's man vs. man