0
Identify some of the techniques used by speakers to evade issues?
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What do you the scientist want to learn more about?
because they want to know weather we can live there cuz were trashing out earth !! also because they have nothing better to do cancer has a grip on the universe >:( by jimmy
What is difference between threats and weaknesses?
A threat is an external danger, while a weakness is an internal vulnerability..In nature, a deer would perceive a wolf as a threat, because the wolf is an external entity that is capable of hunting and possibly killing the deer. The same deer might perceive its own injured leg as a weakness, because that injury is an internal factor that limits the deer's ability to evade the wolf's attack..In business, a threat is an other organization's ability to negatively impact your company's ability to achieve its goals. For example, another company may have just announced the launch of a new product that performs better and costs less than your product does, thus making it more difficult for your company to achieve its desired sales targets. An example of a weakness within your company might be that you have little research and development funds available, making upgrades to your product more difficult to match your competitor's new product..Weaknesses can exist in other entities too, just as you can harbor threats. In the nature example above, suppose the wolf has a disease that caused it to go blind in one eye - that is a weakness internal to the wolf that reduces its threat upon the deer. In business, managers evaluate all the known and suspected threats and weaknesses across all the relevant organizations (including their own) in an attempt to assess the overall risk factors before undertaking specific initiatives.
What is the purpose of mimicry?
It protects one or both species. It's a variety of camouflage. It has the advantage that the species that mimics other poisonous or bad-tasting does not need to waste energy at developing and maintaining a venomous defence. It all comes down to maximal fitness in the end. If one unharmful species can survive and reproduce by mimicing another one's colours without wasting the energy otherwise needed to maintain a venom etc, then that's a double win for the species. Usually it's often bright coulors that stands in contrast of one another, like black/yellow, red/black etc.
What are the odds that evolution is true?
ANSWERS * There are countless evidences for micro-evolution, that is, adaptations of species; scientists believe this also occurred as macro-evolution, the development of new species. There is also substantial evidence for natural selection, the survival of species that are best adapted to their environment. Evolution does not address the origin of life. Beyond that, it would certainly be difficult to show conclusively that evolution is the sole explanation for the development and survival or extinction of species. * Evolution is far and away the best explanation for all the facts regarding life on earth and the changes it has undergone. Evolution, the idea that life has been here on earth and has been changing over millions of years, is fact. Darwin's tree of life is real, and fact-proven. The facts of evolution are presented in modern evolutionary synthesis (MES). There is a mountain of facts that are stacked up behind MES. The evidence is overwhelming. Note that it is not a question of the facts supporting MES, but rather MES explains all the many facts we have gathered about life on earth, about its tenure here and the many changes it has gone through over the billions of years since it began. [And evolution doesn't say man evolved from monkeys. It only says we have a common ancestor. It is a good idea to check facts before arguing against a point of view.] It should be fairly noted that MES offers no proof whatsoever regarding abiogenesis (the creation of life). There is no physical evidence of any kind that speaks to the animation of mud by lighting. Only a number of theories are set out to offer what might have happened. In the mean time, anyone who is sitting in biology and learning about evolution is learning scientific fact. Life has been on earth for billions of years, and it has been changing against the backdrop of a changing earth for all that time. If life did not change when the earth did, that life died. It's that simple. Evolution as it is presented in modern evolutionary synthesis is fact. And the vast majority of scientists and scientific organizations worldwide are in agreement. This is what is currently taught in biology class, and correctly so.* Scientists find apparent evidence of macro-evolution everywhere in the fossil record. One example of an apparently transitional species is the 380 million-year-old fossil of a primitive fish, Gogonasus. It had fins some scientists believe were strong enough to support its weight in shallow water and propel itself along. A scan of the fossil, using a three-dimensional X-ray microscope, revealed its skeleton had several features that were like those of a four-legged land animal, or tetrapod. They included a structure similar to one of the bones of a middle ear; and there were arm-like bones in its fins:the radius and ulna, as are also in the pectoral fins of whales. Here was a fish that seems to have evolved to a point where it had much in common with later land animals. * No, there are also evidences that indicate evolution is not true. There are many biological organisms and organs that appear to be irreducibly complex, such as the eye. Which part of the eye could have evolved first from accidental mutation? Why did it survive natural selection--what use was it without the rest of the eye? These evidences are not accepted as valid arguments by evolutionary scientists.* Macro-evolution -- the development of entirely new species from existing ones, such as dinosaurs evolving into birds -- has no indisputable evidence. Can you observe it? No. Can you demonstrate it? No. The evidences offered tend to be of the noted similarities variety and without an intelligent intervention, evolution is the only explanation that seems to work. Adaptations merely show selection for traits already present in the gene pool. There is no evidence for addition of complex design information, such as would be required for amoeba to human evolution. The opponents of evolution would claim that the similarities could as easily be evidences of common design.* Of course we can not observe macro-evolution taking place, simply because the timescales are too long. But we can demonstrate it. In the example suggested above by a skeptic, the evolution of dinosaurs into birds, scientists have found rock impressions of dinosaur bodies, showing the presence of feathers. Of course the dinosaur in question did not use feathers to fly, but to keep warm. And Archaeoptrix was a dinosaur, but it was also almost a bird.* There's a reason they call it the Theory of Evolution - that means that even the people who believe in it 100% know it can't be proven. * Despite over 70 years of militant teaching that evolution is true, there have been no, count it, no definitive correlations between this theory and fact. Despite the wishful thinking of the evolutionists, there has been no proof that Darwin's Origin of the Species was correct. Short version...my ancestors were men...Darwin's might have been apes, but there's no proof. * Not only is there no evidence that evolution is true the switching of terms to make it sound true only hides the fact, it doesn't make it any more true. The reference here is to the proven fact that organisms change in response to their environment. This is called natural selection but it is not evolution as the organism does not evolve into anything else. It merely uses the genetic information in its gene pool to either adapt, or in some cases unfortunately, it becomes extinct. There is no evidence that species change into something else. Genetics demonstrates that there are definite limits to change. To equate natural selection with evolution is pseudo-science.* Evolution is widely regarded as fact by virtually all earth and life scientists, some of whom are Christian. Evolution unifies and explains hundreds of thousands of facts in several areas of science extremely elegantly, it allows us to predict with startling accuracy where we will find fossils, how old they will be when we find them, what they will look like and why, and allows us to fight disease by using evolutionary principles to determine how diseases will evolve over time. Evolution is observed at every level, from natural selection to speciation (the formation of new species).* Apart from their being no evidence that evolution is true there is also much evidence that directly contradicts various aspects of evolutionary dogma.
What is the sentence of the evade?
I came up to the off ramp just in time to evade the traffic jam.
How do you put evade in a sentence?
A person who didn't want to answer this question would evade it. I see no reason to evade your questions.
Use evade in a sentence?
I try to evade my wife when it is time to clean.
How do you use the word evade in a sentence?
John List managed to evade the police for 18 years, until a neighbor turned him in after seeing him on America's Most Wanted.To evade danger, Chuck hid in the bushes until the mob passed.
A sentence for the word evade?
If the bandits evade capture the will cross the border into Canada.
A sentence with the word evade?
I was able to evade him for now, but I doubt that I'll be able to do so forever.
Is it illegal to evade a civil restraining order?
It is illegal to evade a civil restraining order. Once you evade it, you may be held in contempt of court. You may also face criminal sanctions.
Can you give me a example of the word evade in a sentence?
Chief Joseph was able to evade his pursuers for a long time.
What is eluded?
same as evade
How did the government and catholic bishop tried to evade the consequences of the secularization act?
how did the catholic bishop evade the consequences of the secularization act
What is the verb spelling for evasion?
To evade
What is the verb form of evasion?
evade
