I don't think burning a gas to power a car is either Chemical nor Physical. If you burn gasoline to power a car, it is therefore a chemical AND physical change because both the chemicals and the look changes. However, a car being powered has nothing to do with the substance of gas being changed. If the car uses the gas to power itself, it'll turn the gas into gas again, so I'm not sure how this works. In conclusion, it's probably neither.
i think is a chemical change because it changes and cannot come back to normal state.
chemical change
The burning of gasoline is a chemical change.
Gasoline evaporation is a physical process.
No, it would be a physical change. During a chemical change, substance(s) are changed into different substances. An example of a chemical change would be the rusting of iron but a physical change would be freezing water; or in this case, evaporation.
Chemical but the energy released has physical consequences.
Dissolution is a physical change.
The burning of gasoline is a chemical change. The evaporation of gasoline is a physical change. This is a physical change because it is a change in state of matter (from liquid to gas).
The burning of gasoline is a chemical change.
Combustion of gasoline changes the chemical properties of the matter, and is thus a chemical change, not a physical one.
No, it is a physical change. The water and gasoline retain their chemical and physical properties.
Chemical change
Chemical change
Gasoline evaporation is a physical process.
This is a physical change.
The burning of the gasoline is a chemical change.
No, it would be a physical change. During a chemical change, substance(s) are changed into different substances. An example of a chemical change would be the rusting of iron but a physical change would be freezing water; or in this case, evaporation.
the physical comes from the chemical explosion
Chemical but the energy released has physical consequences.