No per capita GDP is only an average figure it does not mean everyone is more prosperous
In general, economic development is measured by GDP per capita, so an economically developed society would simply have a relatively high GDP per capita. This result implies development of key components of GDP, such as capital, labour, natural resources, infrastructure, education, healthcare, and transportation.
The GDP per capita of Nigeria is low however is rapidly growing. As of 2009 it was $2,249 and 140th largest in the world.
No, the fistribution of income must also be considered.
Not good.buts gonna get better and better and will have per capita 70,000$
If the population of a country was growing while the real GDP remained the same,it would signify that the per capita income remained stagnant.
In general, economic development is measured by GDP per capita, so an economically developed society would simply have a relatively high GDP per capita. This result implies development of key components of GDP, such as capital, labour, natural resources, infrastructure, education, healthcare, and transportation.
The GDP per capita of Nigeria is low however is rapidly growing. As of 2009 it was $2,249 and 140th largest in the world.
It is one of the most economically advanced cities in Mexico, with a GDP per capita of US$46,634 (2010).
It is considered a less developed country because it has a GDP per capita less than 3000
The GDP per Capita of India is low but rapidly growing. Currently it is $2,941 the 128th highest in the world and comparable to that of Moldova and Vietnam.
No, the fistribution of income must also be considered.
Not good.buts gonna get better and better and will have per capita 70,000$
Canada's annual income is 34,000 per capita household. ( Canada ranked 14 out of the top 25 country's with the most annual income). Per capita household means for everyone 1 household. Average people in per capita household : 4
The Maldives is an LEDC, less economically developed country. Despite the fact the country receives large amounts of money from tourism, the GDP per capita is low.
Both are very different nations separated by ocean so an direct comparison is bound to be one sided. Furthermore, GDP is a dynamic thing and China's fast-growing economy can't be compared to Japan's more stagnant economy. Economically China surpassed Japan in GDP because of its large population (1.4 bn+) while Japan has an small population of .12 bn. However this means that Japanese have per capita income of $42,500 while China has per capita income of only $4283 i.e. the mean Japanese is on average ten times more rich than the mean Chinese. On the other hand, the cost of living in Japan is markedly higher than in China.
If the population of a country was growing while the real GDP remained the same,it would signify that the per capita income remained stagnant.
you can download capita-sims at capitasimsfreedownload.tk